2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11009-014-9430-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Laplace Transform of the Lognormal Distribution

Abstract: Integral transforms of the lognormal distribution are of great importance in statistics and probability, yet closed-form expressions do not exist. A wide variety of methods have been employed to provide approximations, both analytical and numerical. In this paper, we analyze a closed-form approximation L(θ) of the Laplace transform L(θ) which is obtained via a modified version of Laplace's method. This approximation, given in terms of the Lambert W (•) function, is tractable enough for applications. We prove t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as a derivative of the exponential twisting technique, the proposed approach presents the drawback of requiring the existence of a closedform expression for the MGF. Such a requirement cannot be met in the case of a Log-normal RV, and hence an estimator for the MGF was used instead [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as a derivative of the exponential twisting technique, the proposed approach presents the drawback of requiring the existence of a closedform expression for the MGF. Such a requirement cannot be met in the case of a Log-normal RV, and hence an estimator for the MGF was used instead [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first difficulty is that L ( θ ) is not explicitly available for the lognormal distribution. However, approximations with error rates were recently given in the companion paper Asmussen et al () (see also Laub et al, ). The result is in terms of the Lambert W function W ( a ) (Corless et al, ), defined as the unique solution of W ( a )e W ( a ) = a for a > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is in terms of the Lambert W function W ( a ) (Corless et al, ), defined as the unique solution of W ( a )e W ( a ) = a for a > 0. The expression for the Laplace transform L ( θ ) from Asmussen et al () is the case k = 0 in Proposition later, the general case being the expectation double-struckE[XknormaleθX]. Note that the Lambert W function is convenient for numerical computations because it is implemented in many software packages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since snormalp is typically lognormally distributed, and Jhet and ρas are exponentially dependent on the variation in composition, the NPDF likely follows a lognormal distribution, as nfalse(ξfalse)=eln2false(ξfalse)2σϕ22πσϕξ, where σϕ quantifies the interdroplet variation in ice nucleation efficiency. Using equation , equation can be analytically evaluated (Asmussen et al, ). Equation can also be used to find either ρas or Jhet from measurements of fnormalf.…”
Section: Theoretical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%