2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the lack of semiconcavity of the subRiemannian distance in a class of Carnot groups

Abstract: We show by explicit estimates that the SubRiemannian distance in a Carnot group of step two is locally semiconcave away from the diagonal if and only if the group does not contain abnormal minimizing curves. Moreover, we prove that local semiconcavity fails to hold in the step-3 Engel group, even in the weaker "horizontal" sense.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, as proved in [ABCK97], Martinet spheres possess outward corners in correspondence of points reached by abnormal minimizing geodesics, and this implies the loss of semiconcavity. The same characterization holds for the Engel group (a step 3 and rank 2 Carnot structure on R 4 ), and for all free Carnot group of step 2, as proved in [MM16]. Finally, in [MM17], the authors proved the inclusion CutOpt(x) ⊆ SC + (x) for the free Carnot group of step 2 and rank 3.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In fact, as proved in [ABCK97], Martinet spheres possess outward corners in correspondence of points reached by abnormal minimizing geodesics, and this implies the loss of semiconcavity. The same characterization holds for the Engel group (a step 3 and rank 2 Carnot structure on R 4 ), and for all free Carnot group of step 2, as proved in [MM16]. Finally, in [MM17], the authors proved the inclusion CutOpt(x) ⊆ SC + (x) for the free Carnot group of step 2 and rank 3.…”
Section: 21mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…However, it is known that the subRiemannian distance is smooth outside of the abnormal set and of the cut locus. In our model, it turns out that the abnormal set has the form Abn 0 = V × 0 ∧ 2 V (see Section 2.3) and it has been proved that the distance from the origin d is not differentiable at any abnormal point (see [MM16] for precise estimates). As a byproduct of our Theorem 3.2 it is easy to see that d is not differentiable at any point of Cut 0 (see Remark 3.7).…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of The Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Concerning the three dimensional case, dim V = 3, it is well known that any bivector t ∈ ∧ 2 V can be written in the elementary form t = x ∧ y, for suitable x, y ∈ V. Although the choice of x and y is not unique, the subspace span{x, y} does not depend on such choice and it is called support of the bivector. See the discussion in [MM16], where the higher dimensional case is treated.…”
Section: Bivectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2.8. -We refer the reader to [21] for an other notion of horizontal semiconcavity of interest that has been investigated by Montanari and Morbidelli in the framework of Carnot groups.…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fouriermentioning
confidence: 99%