2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2204.00695
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Korányi Spherical maximal function on Heisenberg groups

Abstract: We prove L p → L q estimates for the local maximal operator associated with dilates of the Kóranyi sphere in Heisenberg groups. These estimates are sharp up to endpoints and imply new bounds on sparse domination for the corresponding global maximal operator. We also prove sharp L p → L q estimates for spherical means over the Korányi sphere, which can be used to improve the sparse domination bounds in [10] for the associated lacunary maximal operator.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally we remark that the behavior of maximal operators associated with the codimension two spherical means considered here is quite different from the behavior of maximal functions associated with hypersurfaces in the Heisenberg group. Of particular interest here is the Korányi sphere, for which the sharp L p improving properties of the local full maximal operator up to endpoints were obtained in a recent paper by one of the authors [27], see also partial results about averages in previous work [11] by Ganguly and Thangavelu.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Finally we remark that the behavior of maximal operators associated with the codimension two spherical means considered here is quite different from the behavior of maximal functions associated with hypersurfaces in the Heisenberg group. Of particular interest here is the Korányi sphere, for which the sharp L p improving properties of the local full maximal operator up to endpoints were obtained in a recent paper by one of the authors [27], see also partial results about averages in previous work [11] by Ganguly and Thangavelu.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%