2005
DOI: 10.5194/acp-5-2833-2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the isolation of elemental carbon (EC) for micro-molar <sup>14</sup>C accelerator mass spectrometry: development of a hybrid reference material for <sup>14</sup>C-EC accuracy assurance, and a critical evaluation of the thermal optical kinetic (TOK) EC isolation procedure

Abstract: Abstract. The primary objective of the research reported here has been the development of a hybrid reference material (RM) to serve as a test of accuracy for elemental carbon (EC) isotopic ( 14 C) speciation measurements. Such measurements are vital for the quantitative apportionment of fossil and biomass sources of "soot" (EC), the tracer of fire that has profound effects on health, atmospheric visibility, and climate. Previous studies of 14 C-EC measurement quality, carried out with NIST SRM 1649a (Urban Dus… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our graphite measurements of large samples are in agreement with the values reported in the literature for SRM 1649 and SRM 1649a (Currie et al, 1984(Currie et al, , 2002Szidat et al, 2004; Table 1. Analyses of mixtures of SRM 2975 and SRM 1515 standards in the form of solid graphite targets of large samples (roughly 1 mgC).…”
Section: Contamination Quantificationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our graphite measurements of large samples are in agreement with the values reported in the literature for SRM 1649 and SRM 1649a (Currie et al, 1984(Currie et al, , 2002Szidat et al, 2004; Table 1. Analyses of mixtures of SRM 2975 and SRM 1515 standards in the form of solid graphite targets of large samples (roughly 1 mgC).…”
Section: Contamination Quantificationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Measurements are made with solid target (graphitization, roughly 1 mgC). (Szidat et al, 2004) 0.507-0.61, depending on the sample preparation (Currie et al, 2002;Wise and Watters, 2007) 0.517/0.572 (simple/double combustion) (Heal et al, 2011) Solid measurement SRM 1649: 0.61 ± 0.04 (Currie et al, 1984) Wise and Watters, 2007;Heal et al, 2011). The F 14 C value for the online gas measurements is 0.505, with a SD of 0.028, N = 7, and a σ er of 0.010, whereas the determined F 14 C for the solid measurements is 0.532 with a SD of 0.004, N = 4, and a σ er of 0.002.…”
Section: Contamination Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, petroleum geochemists have long coupled thermal analysis methods with isotope ratio measurements in order to investigate the origins and maturity of thermogenic hydrocarbons, leading to the development of techniques such as pyGCisotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS; Galimov, 1988;Berner and Faber, 1996;Cramer, 2004 Lopez-Capel et al, 2006, 2008. Furthermore, Szidat et al (2004) and Currie and Kessler (2005) successfully separated and determined the radiocarbon ( 14 C) content of organic and elemental ("black") carbon fractions in aerosols using a stepped-temperature approach, confirming the possibility that thermal-isotope techniques can be used in tandem with radiocarbon analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Such analyses separate compounds within a bulk sample based on various metrics of lability -that is, susceptibility to remineralization by chemical hydrolysis (Helfrich et al, 2007), uv light (Follett et al, 2014), heat (Szidat et al, 2004;Currie and Kessler, 2005;Rosenheim et al, 2008), microbial respiration (Beaupré et al, 2016) Like bulk measurements, serial oxidation techniques benefit from the fact that all carbon contained within a sample is analyzed, and results therefore reflect the entire complex OC mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, the methods used to fully separate OC and EC for 14 C-based source apportionment have relied on rather time-consuming techniques, thus allowing only manual and off-line 14 C measurements (Szidat et al 2004b). A thermo-optical, "split-point"-based method for EC isolation and subsequent 14 C analysis was proposed by Currie and Kessler (2005), and presented minimized, but not totally suppressed, charringinduced EC contamination. A new separation method using a thermo-optical OC/EC analyzer in pure oxygen is currently under development to circumvent that charring issue and achieve in a single run the physical separation of OC and EC and their direct recovery as CO 2 for later off-line 14 C measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%