System Theory, the Schur Algorithm and Multidimensional Analysis 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8137-0_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Irreducibility of a Class of Homogeneous Operators

Abstract: Abstract. In this paper we construct a class of homogeneous Hilbert modules over the disc algebra A(D) as quotients of certain natural modules over the function algebra A(D 2 ). These quotient modules are described using the jet construction for Hilbert modules. We show that the quotient modules obtained this way, belong to the class B k (D) and that they are mutually inequivalent, irreducible and homogeneous.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…defines an unitary representation of G onto H K , provided U (H K ) ⊂ H K . We now recall following theorem about equivalent conditions for homogeneous operators from [7]. (b) The reproducing kernel K is quasi-invariant, that is, it transforms according to the rule K(z, w) = J g (z)K(gz, gw)J g (w) * , for all g ∈ G and z, w ∈ Ω for some continuous function J : G × Ω → GL(r, C) holomorphic in the second variable denoted by J(g, z) = J g (z).…”
Section: Homogeneity Of Multiplication Operators Of Quotient Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…defines an unitary representation of G onto H K , provided U (H K ) ⊂ H K . We now recall following theorem about equivalent conditions for homogeneous operators from [7]. (b) The reproducing kernel K is quasi-invariant, that is, it transforms according to the rule K(z, w) = J g (z)K(gz, gw)J g (w) * , for all g ∈ G and z, w ∈ Ω for some continuous function J : G × Ω → GL(r, C) holomorphic in the second variable denoted by J(g, z) = J g (z).…”
Section: Homogeneity Of Multiplication Operators Of Quotient Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 4, we discuss on irreducibility of the homogeneous operators obtained in Section 3. We point out from the example given in [7,Theorem 6.1] that the compression of the tuple of multiplication operators M onto H q , in general, is not irreducible. In this regard, we take Ω to be D m and consider the subspace…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The set {δ i > 0 : i = 1, 2, 3} satisfying the inequalities of Proposition 3.8 is nonempty. For instance, take δ 1 = 1, δ 2 = 2 and any δ 3 in the interval (9,12). Then {δ 1 , δ 2 , δ 3 } meets the requirement.…”
Section: It Will Be Convenient To Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the unitary equivalence class of the curvature at 0 determines the unitary equivalence class of these operators within the class of the generalised Wilkins operarotrs of rank k + 1 (cf. [12], [2, page 428]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such a classification appears to be intractable. On the other hand, using the jet construction of [11], we produce many examples of homogeneous operators [3,17]. Unfortunately, this construction does not give a complete list of homogeneous operators in B n (D) except in the case of n = 1, 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%