1979
DOI: 10.1002/bip.1979.360181215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the ionic‐strength dependence of the intrinsic viscosity of DNA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, Brochard and de Gennes (29) developed a scaling argument explaining polymer stretching under confinement within a channel, where a selfavoiding chain is considered as a series of blobs provided that channel dimensions are much larger than the persistence length (D Ͼ Ͼ P) and the polymer contour length is greater than D (L Ͼ Ͼ D). In their treatment, the stretch (X/L) of a polymer (persistence length P and molecule width w) in a channel (width (10,29,32,33); however, this argument is not valid for highly stretched polymers (e.g., X/L Ͼ 0.5). Instead, for highly stretched polymer chains under nanoconfinement, a different scaling argument (25) treats polymer stretching within a nanochannel as a long chain deflected by the walls of a nanochannel with the stretch given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, Brochard and de Gennes (29) developed a scaling argument explaining polymer stretching under confinement within a channel, where a selfavoiding chain is considered as a series of blobs provided that channel dimensions are much larger than the persistence length (D Ͼ Ͼ P) and the polymer contour length is greater than D (L Ͼ Ͼ D). In their treatment, the stretch (X/L) of a polymer (persistence length P and molecule width w) in a channel (width (10,29,32,33); however, this argument is not valid for highly stretched polymers (e.g., X/L Ͼ 0.5). Instead, for highly stretched polymer chains under nanoconfinement, a different scaling argument (25) treats polymer stretching within a nanochannel as a long chain deflected by the walls of a nanochannel with the stretch given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40,41 Theoretical work in support of the ionic strength influence is also available. 65,66 Analysis of available data shows, for example, that a 100% change (0.1 ? 0.2M) in salt concentration causes $6% change (reduction) in [g].…”
Section: Salt Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[73,74] For a charged polymer, it is necessary to introduce an electrostatic contribution L e (the total persistence length being L t ¼ L p þ L e at a given ionic concentration) following the Odijk development. [75] The local stiffness of the polysaccharides allows the high viscosity obtained to be interpreted for a given molecular weight compared to a flexible polymer. The L p value, obtained in a large excess of salt, is characteristic of the local structure of the polysaccharides and can be predicted from molecular modeling, as recently shown.…”
Section: Conformation and Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%