2003
DOI: 10.1086/377250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Invariant Distribution of Galaxies in there‐〈μ〉ePlane out toz = 0.64

Abstract: We study the evolution of the relation between half-light (effective) radius, r e , and mean surface brightness, < µ > e , known as Kormendy relation, out to redshift z = 0.64 in V-band restframe on the basis of a large sample of spheroidal galaxies (N = 228) belonging to three clusters of galaxies. The present sample constitutes the largest data set for which the Kormendy relation is investigated up to a lookback time of ∼ 6 Gyr (H 0 = 70 Kms −1 Mpc −1 , Ω M = 0.3, Ω Λ = 0.7). A new fitting procedure, which s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
88
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(40 reference statements)
9
88
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The low value of the Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ = 0.3) reflects the large scatter of the relation when all the comparison galaxies are considered together. The rms deviation in µ e from the fitted relation (rms = 0.7 mag arcsec −2 ) is slightly larger than values quoted in earlier works (e.g., Hamabe & Kormendy 1987;La Barbera et al 2003) making it difficult to observe a clear trend, contrary to previous findings (e.g., Aguerri et al 2004;Ravikumar et al 2006). However, comparing galaxies with different absolute magnitudes could be misleading because of the strong bias caused by selecting systems with different stellar masses (Nigoche-Netro et al 2008).…”
Section: Kormendy Relationcontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The low value of the Pearson correlation coefficient (ρ = 0.3) reflects the large scatter of the relation when all the comparison galaxies are considered together. The rms deviation in µ e from the fitted relation (rms = 0.7 mag arcsec −2 ) is slightly larger than values quoted in earlier works (e.g., Hamabe & Kormendy 1987;La Barbera et al 2003) making it difficult to observe a clear trend, contrary to previous findings (e.g., Aguerri et al 2004;Ravikumar et al 2006). However, comparing galaxies with different absolute magnitudes could be misleading because of the strong bias caused by selecting systems with different stellar masses (Nigoche-Netro et al 2008).…”
Section: Kormendy Relationcontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…On the other hand, some studies have also claimed that the data are consistent with the hierarchical evolutionary scenario (e.g., Kauffmann and Charlot, 1993;Kauffmann, 1996). Working with a large sample of ETGs in three clusters at different redshifts, La Barbera et al (2003) concluded that the slope of the µ e -log(r e ) relation is almost invariant up to z ∼ 0.64 (a KR ∼ 2.91 ± 0.08).…”
Section: The Kormendy Relation (Kr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the structural relations are constructed for galaxy samples at different redshifts, several studies report similarly (Barger et al 1998;Ziegler et al 1999;La Barbera et al 2003;Barr et al 2006) that only the zero point of these relations depends on the redshift and this dependence may be caused by the passive evolution of the stellar populations that form at high redshift (z form > 2). Nevertheless, their results conflict with those of other authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%