2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03226.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interpretation of the multicolour disc model for black hole candidates

Abstract: We present a critical analysis of the usual interpretation of the multicolour disc model parameters for black hole candidates in terms of the inner radius and temperature of the accretion disc. Using a self‐consistent model for the radiative transfer and the vertical temperature structure in a Shakura–Sunyaev disc, we simulate the observed disc spectra, taking into account Doppler blurring and gravitational redshift, and fit them with multicolour models. We show not only that such a model systematically undere… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
285
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 242 publications
(305 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(22 reference statements)
17
285
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a distance of 7.4 kpc and an inclination angle of 35 • , we obtain a best-fitting value of 11.4 km. However, this value is generally considered an underestimation of the true inner radius by a factor of ∼2 (Merloni et al 2000). Taking these corrective factors into account, we derive an inner disk radius of ∼10 R g , consistent with the smearing factor of the reflection component and with our estimate of the outer boundary layer radius as derived by the ratio of the continuum fluxes (D'Aí et al 2007;D'Aì et al 2009).…”
Section: The Soft Statesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Using a distance of 7.4 kpc and an inclination angle of 35 • , we obtain a best-fitting value of 11.4 km. However, this value is generally considered an underestimation of the true inner radius by a factor of ∼2 (Merloni et al 2000). Taking these corrective factors into account, we derive an inner disk radius of ∼10 R g , consistent with the smearing factor of the reflection component and with our estimate of the outer boundary layer radius as derived by the ratio of the continuum fluxes (D'Aí et al 2007;D'Aì et al 2009).…”
Section: The Soft Statesupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The apparent inner radius of the soft disk blackbody emission gives a radius of 8 ± 2 km, calculated for a distance to the source of 4.5 kpc (Kuulkers & van der Klis 2000). Note that this value is thought to underestimate the true inner radius by a factor of more than 2 (Merloni et al 2000). The power law dependence of the disk emissivity, r betor , is parametrized by the index betor, which is −(2.61 ± 0.03), indicating that the disk emission is dominated by irradiation by a central source (see Fabian et al 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…From the normalization of the thermal component we are able to calculate the inner radius of the accretion disc (R in = D √ (N/ cos θ) km, D is the distance of the source in units of 10 kpc, θ is the inclination angle of the disc, and N is the normalization of the disc-blackbody). However, this radius is always underestimated, since what we calculate is not the effective radius of the disc (the radius corresponding to the higher inner temperature), but the radius derived from the color temperature (see Merloni et al 1999). All the energy spectra are fitted using this model, modified with photoelectric absorption (the equivalent hydrogen column density was fixed to 7 × 10 22 cm −2 , see Sect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%