1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00003-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interpretation of feeding behaviour measures and the use of feeding rate as an indicator of social constraint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
144
1
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
11
144
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Daily intake is the product of the number of meals the cow consumes each day and the amount of feed consumed in each meal (Tolkamp et al 2000). Changes in the components of meal patterns can result in an increase or decrease in daily DMI (Nielsen 1999). Of the components of meal patterns in our experiment, meal size caused the largest impact on DMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Daily intake is the product of the number of meals the cow consumes each day and the amount of feed consumed in each meal (Tolkamp et al 2000). Changes in the components of meal patterns can result in an increase or decrease in daily DMI (Nielsen 1999). Of the components of meal patterns in our experiment, meal size caused the largest impact on DMI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Reduced eating rate has been associated with reduced feeding motivation (Nielsen, 1999), suggesting reduced palatability, as was the case when the buffer was fed alone free-choice (Keunen et al, 2003). However, if low palatability was responsible for the reduction in feed intake, then eating rate, meal size and DMI should have been reduced from the beginning of the feeding cycle, which did not occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high level of hunger is often associated with a faster intake of food (Nielsen, 1999). In the Feeding Rate test, birds on feed C1 ate more feed during the test than birds on the other two feeds, suggesting that these birds were hungrier at their usual feeding time (i.e.…”
Section: Hunger Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%