2000
DOI: 10.1109/43.892848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interplay between meshing and discretization in three-dimensional diffusion simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, as mentioned in "Spatial discretizations of the heat Equation" section, the effective-diffusion matrix of the discretization isH =M −1 K. Since each of rowH is proportional to the corresponding row of K [see Eq. (17)]. The following result (see [14]) is valid:…”
Section: On the Issue Of Generating Thermodynamically Compatible Finimentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, as mentioned in "Spatial discretizations of the heat Equation" section, the effective-diffusion matrix of the discretization isH =M −1 K. Since each of rowH is proportional to the corresponding row of K [see Eq. (17)]. The following result (see [14]) is valid:…”
Section: On the Issue Of Generating Thermodynamically Compatible Finimentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A natural question to be made is whether the issue of nodal thermodynamic incompatibility of consistent FE Discretizations, discussed here for the 1D and 2D cases, also happens in the 3D case. Recent Finite-Element formulas presented in DMP works [15][16][17][18]) indicate that the problem is also present in 3D FE discretizations.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Incompatibility Of 2d Finite Element Discretizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the authors in [7] discussed the use of such coupling between stabilized finite elements and finite difference time integration on more general problems such as the advection-diffusion-reaction problems. Other related ideas was proposed like, mesh refinement [10], M-matrix theory [11], finite volume method [12], discontinuous Galerkin models [13] and the diffusion-split method [14]. Inspired by all these methods, we believe that the proposed approach works for general meshes, can use any time step or diffusion parameter and, with low computational cost offers a good accuracy order.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The Galerkin (standard) version of the finite element method (FEM) applied to diffusion problems, when used with linear tetrahedral (P1) elements, does not in general satisfy the maximum principle [1][2] [3]. Physically, this principle guarantees to obtain the maximum/minimum of the solution only at the initial time or at the boundary, in the latter case a flow from/to the outside must exist [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the geometrical constraints on the mesh prevent from using general Delaunay meshing codes. This leads Kosik et al [3] to directly discourage the use of P1 finite elements, promoting the use of the finite volume method (FVM). However, we can not ignore the wide diffusion of FEM in the existing codes, as well as its versatility compared to FVM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%