2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interest of penetration depth, canopy area and volume metrics to improve Lidar-based models of forest parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Point density metrics (d02, d03, d04, d05, and d08) were also influential variables for M2a. Point density metrics were also used in the final models in [60] for predicting the vertical distribution of heights and penetration depths in an area-based approach. The best independent variables to estimate AGB for a boreal forest showed by [23] were one variable related to canopy height and another one related to canopy density (similar to point density here).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Point density metrics (d02, d03, d04, d05, and d08) were also influential variables for M2a. Point density metrics were also used in the final models in [60] for predicting the vertical distribution of heights and penetration depths in an area-based approach. The best independent variables to estimate AGB for a boreal forest showed by [23] were one variable related to canopy height and another one related to canopy density (similar to point density here).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous studies [22,26,[58][59][60], one source of error that may influence the relationship between the lidar-and the field-estimated AGB at different spatial resolutions is the disagreement between the lidar and field plot measurements over which trees or parts of trees are inside the calibration plots. In the lidar measurements, tree crowns are bisected exactly at the plot edge, while in the field plot measurements, an individual is included in the plot if its basal area contributes to the basal area of the plot; in other words, if the DBH trunk point of measure is inside the plot.…”
Section: Lidar Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various algorithms have been successfully developed to estimate tree height [26], leaf area index [27,28], aboveground biomass [29], canopy cover [7,30,31] at both individual tree [29,32,33] and forest stand scales [34,35]. However, studies on LiDAR-based CBH estimation are still insufficient, particularly at individual-tree scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While progress has recently been made at tree level [56,62], currently such effects remain difficult to assess on area-based models. This would require simulating forest structure and Lidar signals and developing metrics more robust to the variation in both forest structure and terrain conditions [63].…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%