Space in Language and Linguistics 2013
DOI: 10.1515/9783110312027.276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interactive achievement of space – and its possible meanings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A common arrangement, especially for small gatherings, is the F-formation ( Kendon, 1990 ); i.e., a spatial configuration with which people establish “an overlap of their transactional segments […], enabling them to use these segments as a joint interaction space” ( Ciolek and Kendon, 1980 , p. 241; cf. Hausendorf, 2013 ; Mondada, 2013 ), which is also called “o-space” ( Ciolek and Kendon, 1980 , p. 243). Ciolek and Kendon describe different F-formations that are open or more closed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common arrangement, especially for small gatherings, is the F-formation ( Kendon, 1990 ); i.e., a spatial configuration with which people establish “an overlap of their transactional segments […], enabling them to use these segments as a joint interaction space” ( Ciolek and Kendon, 1980 , p. 241; cf. Hausendorf, 2013 ; Mondada, 2013 ), which is also called “o-space” ( Ciolek and Kendon, 1980 , p. 243). Ciolek and Kendon describe different F-formations that are open or more closed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Frage, welche sozialen und kulturellen Implikationen damit jeweils verbunden sind und was konkrete Formen der Raumnutzung für den Vollzug der Interaktion in solchen Funktionsräumen bedeuten, berührt den Kern der Sozialtopografie. In ihrem Zentrum stehen die unterschied-8 Zum Konzept Interaktionsraum, das inzwischen im Kontext der Analyse multimodaler Interaktion zur aktiven Herstellung körperlich-räumlicher Konstellationen der Interaktionsbeteiligten mit unterschiedlicher Nuancierung etabliert ist, siehe beispielsweise Mondada (2007), Müller/ Bohle (2007), Schmitt/Deppermann (2007), Hausendorf (2013) sowie Schmitt (2013a). 9 Die Konzepte Interaktionsarchitektur und Sozialtopografie sind detailliert ausgeführt in Hausendorf/Schmitt (2013, 2016a.…”
Section: Ritualität Des Verhaltensunclassified
“…The choice to meet in a classroom, which provides chairs that face towards the center of the room was no coincidence, but rather a conscious decision on the part of the instructors. We wanted to exploit the room's architecture to facilitate joint attention (Hausendorf, 2012(Hausendorf, , 2013Hausendorf and Schmitt, 2013). Through the furnishing of the room, the architecture thus flags or invites a particular joint attention.…”
Section: Negotiating a Common Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%