2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the interaction of pure and impure supercritical CO2 with rock forming minerals in saline aquifers: An experimental geochemical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the natural alkalinity of reservoir rock with the presence of trace to moderate carbonates may buffer the initially lowered pH, as has been observed for pure CO 2 injection into the Frio formation, USA (Kharaka et al, 2006). Pure calcite mineral separates and moderate calcite in sandstone core have been observed experimentally to buffer the acidity generated by co-injection of SO 2 with CO 2 to~pH 6 in two studies Wilke et al, 2012). SO 2 co-injection with CO 2 also has the potential for increased ferroan carbonate mineral dissolution to occur compared to pure CO 2 injection, and hence increased cation release into solution (and potentially reservoir porosity-permeability in the short term).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the natural alkalinity of reservoir rock with the presence of trace to moderate carbonates may buffer the initially lowered pH, as has been observed for pure CO 2 injection into the Frio formation, USA (Kharaka et al, 2006). Pure calcite mineral separates and moderate calcite in sandstone core have been observed experimentally to buffer the acidity generated by co-injection of SO 2 with CO 2 to~pH 6 in two studies Wilke et al, 2012). SO 2 co-injection with CO 2 also has the potential for increased ferroan carbonate mineral dissolution to occur compared to pure CO 2 injection, and hence increased cation release into solution (and potentially reservoir porosity-permeability in the short term).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Injecting CO 2 containing SO 2 , O 2 and NO 2 has been predicted or observed to result in the formation of acids stronger than carbonic acid, e.g. sulfuric, and nitric acids (Wilke et al, 2012). Co-injection of impurities such as SO 2 has been predicted to reduce formation water pH to as low as 0-1 (Gunter et al, 2000;Knauss et al, 2005;Xu et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many investigations have put emphasis on the geochemical effects of the impurities contained in the CO 2 streams, including the brine acidification effects by co-injected SO 2 , NO 2 , or H 2 S and the corresponding effects on the porosity and permeability of reservoir and caprock, e.g. [10][11][12][13][14][15], and the hydrocarbon oxidation by the O 2 impurity, e.g. [16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During geologic carbon sequestration, oxidative dissolution of sulfide minerals in the reservoir rock or caprock can occur in the presence of dissolved oxygen (Evangelou and Zhang 1995;Lowson 1982;Moses et al 1987) and subsequently release toxic metals and radionuclides such as uranium into the brine (Keating et al 2010;Little and Jackson 2010). Although a number of previous experimental studies have focused on changes in the major ion composition and mineralogical alteration during the interaction between caprock and CO 2 -brine or supercritical CO 2 (Alemu et al 2011;Credoz et al 2009;Liu et al 2012;Wilke et al 2012), few studies have addressed the effects of redox processes on toxic contaminant mobilization due to other gases co-injected with CO 2 during geologic carbon sequestration. This study focuses on the effect of oxygen in the CO 2 stream on the mobilization of toxic contaminants (e.g., metals and radionuclides) from a caprock (Gothic shale from the Aneth Oil Field, Utah) during the interaction with CO 2 -brine under geological carbon sequestration conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%