2002
DOI: 10.1002/1521-3773(20020415)41:8<1432::aid-anie1432>3.0.co;2-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Interaction between N-Heterocyclic Carbenes and Organic Acids: Structural Authentication of the First N−H⋅⋅⋅C Hydrogen Bond and Remarkably Short C−H⋅⋅⋅O Interactions

Abstract: Two unprecedented hydrogen bonds were observed in the adducts obtained by the reactions of an N‐heterocyclic carbene with a bulky phenol and with diphenylamine. In the former case, proton transfer yields an imidazolium aryloxide (1) containing the shortest C−H⋅⋅⋅O interaction seen to date and in the latter, the hydrogen atom remains bound to the organic acid but forms a unique N−H⋅⋅⋅C hydrogen bond (2).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The planarization of the biphenyl backbone (as quantified by the decrease of the C 2 —C 1 —C 1 —C 1′ —C 2′ dihedral angle from 36° in 1 to 1° in TS 1 → 4 ) allows the carbene center to approach the C 2′ —H bond enough for the insertion to occur. The disrupting C 2′ —H bond is elongated in TS 1 → 4 by 35% compared to that of carbene 1 (1.46 vs 1.08 Å), while the forming C carbene —H bond is elongated in TS 1 → 4 by only 10% compared to that of the insertion product 4 (1.21 vs 1.10 Å), indicating a very advanced proton transfer from C 2′ to the carbene center 18. In parallel, the distance between the two carbon centers C carbene and C 2′ remains long (2.31 Å) and the N—C carbene π-interaction remains strong.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The planarization of the biphenyl backbone (as quantified by the decrease of the C 2 —C 1 —C 1 —C 1′ —C 2′ dihedral angle from 36° in 1 to 1° in TS 1 → 4 ) allows the carbene center to approach the C 2′ —H bond enough for the insertion to occur. The disrupting C 2′ —H bond is elongated in TS 1 → 4 by 35% compared to that of carbene 1 (1.46 vs 1.08 Å), while the forming C carbene —H bond is elongated in TS 1 → 4 by only 10% compared to that of the insertion product 4 (1.21 vs 1.10 Å), indicating a very advanced proton transfer from C 2′ to the carbene center 18. In parallel, the distance between the two carbon centers C carbene and C 2′ remains long (2.31 Å) and the N—C carbene π-interaction remains strong.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1a), showing these species can be structurally authenticated. 31 Movassaghi and Schmidt also identied a MeOH/IMes adduct in their efforts to catalyze amidation reactions with carbenes, authenticating the adduct both in solid-and solution-state ( Fig. 1a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…33 Previous studies of non-traditional X-H/:C hydrogen bonding (X ¼ N (ref. 31) or O (ref. 32, 47, 48 and 64)) did not quantitate the strengths of interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 NHCs as strong Lewis bases are readily protonated to imidazolium cations. 31 In this study, we employed 1,3,4,5-tetramethylimidazol-2-ylidene, NHC Me 4 , 32 and 1,3-diisopropyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene, NHC i Pr 2 Me 2 , 32 as precursors to N , N ′-dialkylimidazolium counter cations with differing steric bulk at the N centers to directly deprotonate anionic phosphate monoesters. 33 Indeed, the 1:1 reactions of 4 with NHC Me 4 and NHC i Pr 2 Me 2 in dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) afforded compounds 12 and 13 , respectively (Scheme 6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%