2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10587-010-0046-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation with harmonic potential and unbounded coefficient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the classical Laplacian case α = 1, if γ > 0 the problem (1.1) was treated in [7], where well-posedness was discussed via potential-well method, a recent work [27] considers a similar problem with mixed power nonlinearity. If γ < 0, the stability issues for ground states were investigated by many authors [35,14,34,17].…”
Section: (T) = M (U(t)) :=mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classical Laplacian case α = 1, if γ > 0 the problem (1.1) was treated in [7], where well-posedness was discussed via potential-well method, a recent work [27] considers a similar problem with mixed power nonlinearity. If γ < 0, the stability issues for ground states were investigated by many authors [35,14,34,17].…”
Section: (T) = M (U(t)) :=mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) It has been shown in [7] that the inequality (1.1) not only has independent interests, but also has been used to study the existence of local and global solutions of the following inhomogeneous nonlinear Schrödinger equation with harmonic potential term |x| 2 ϕ, (INLS equation henceforth) 2) is a model to describe the Bose-Einstein condensate with attractive inter-particle interactions under magnetic trap [1,18,19]. When (1.2) does not contain |x| 2 ϕ, i.e.,…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Proof The first equality of C(N, p, b) has been proved in [7]. We only prove the second equality of C (N, p, b).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The main result is contained in Theorem 5.3. In order to get these results, we use the ideas originated in [1,3,17], but we emphasize that throughout this paper, the uses of the improved Gagliardo-Nirenberg inequality and the relate best constant [7,8] are essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%