2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-011-9343-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the influence of heterogeneity of graphene sheets in the determination of the pore size distribution of activated carbons

Abstract: We model carbon-based microporous materials, such as activated carbons, taking into account surface defects in the form of geometrical rugosity in the inner surface of each graphitic slit pore. The used model is a simplified variation of the randomly etched graphite (REG) pore model (Seaton et al., Langmuir 13:1199-1204.When subcritical Ar or N 2 is used as probe-gas to simulate the adsorption process in slit pores assembled with ideally perfect graphene walls, the resulting pore size distribution (PSD) rather… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the models proposed in the literature for activated carbon (Do and Do 2006;Lucena et al 2008Lucena et al , 2017Nguyen et al 2008;Oliveira et al 2011), we choose the most used model. The molecular representation of activated carbon is then de ned as slits of graphene layers walls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the models proposed in the literature for activated carbon (Do and Do 2006;Lucena et al 2008Lucena et al , 2017Nguyen et al 2008;Oliveira et al 2011), we choose the most used model. The molecular representation of activated carbon is then de ned as slits of graphene layers walls.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, for one-component adsorption, the bulk gas phase composition y is equal to one (Heuchel et al 1999); N i ex (H,T,P,y) is the excess number of adsorbed molecules of species i in a model pore of width H at temperature T, pressure P and bulk gas-phase composition y; N i abs (H,T,P,y) is the N H T P y N H T P y y is the bulk fluid density of species i at the temperature and pressure of concern; and V bf (H) is the volume in the model pore of width H accessible to the bulk fluid (Oliveira et al 2011). The calculations were performed at a defined temperature and pressure by using the equation of state for ideal gases at low pressures (up to 0.1 MPa) and the Peng-Robinson equation of state (1976) for high pressures, employing the parameters listed in Table 2 (Sandler 1989).…”
Section: Gcmc Analysis Of Pure and Mixture Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In porous membranes, the pore flow model describes pervaporation as liquid permeation under a pressure difference, such as the Hagen–Poiseuille (HP) equation. Most of these conventional models tend to describe the flow behavior based on the assumption of homogeneous fluids ,, and using their bulk properties. However, the fluid is inhomogeneous when confined within nanometer or subnanometer spaces (<2 nm), and their properties, such as density, diffusion coefficient, and viscosity, significantly differ from those observed in bulk phases when confined within nanometer or subnanometer spaces (<2 nm). This is because, according to the molecular collision theory, the interaction between fluids and solids cannot be ignored for the fluids passing through 2D nanochannels. , For example, early studies have mentioned the classical coupling effects of two phenomena during the multicomponent pervaporation process, i.e., the coupling of flow and thermodynamic interactions leads to preferential adsorption . Experimentally, the measurements of attenuated total reflection (ATR) infrared spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) also revealed an ice-like structure of the water molecules near the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%