1994
DOI: 10.1016/0956-716x(94)90367-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the influence of grain morphology on creep rupture times of cavitating materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a considerable scatter in rupture times of specimens 14 and 15 which stem from one blade region with no obvious microstructural heterogeneity. A microstructural explanation for scatter in creep rupture times for materials with elongated grain microstructures was presented by DeMestral and coworkers [18,20]. Orientations of individual macrograins in two specimens can be different and this results in differences in the resolved shear stresses of the corresponding microscopic slip systems [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a considerable scatter in rupture times of specimens 14 and 15 which stem from one blade region with no obvious microstructural heterogeneity. A microstructural explanation for scatter in creep rupture times for materials with elongated grain microstructures was presented by DeMestral and coworkers [18,20]. Orientations of individual macrograins in two specimens can be different and this results in differences in the resolved shear stresses of the corresponding microscopic slip systems [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orientations of individual macrograins in two specimens can be different and this results in differences in the resolved shear stresses of the corresponding microscopic slip systems [18]. The probabilistic nature of creep damage accumulation can result in scatter in creep rupture times when creep life can be subdivided into a period of homogeneous damage accumulation during which a critical region forms which initiates final rupture [20]. It seems rea-a) sonable to assume that these effects increase as specimen size decreases and this would rationalize the considerably higher scatter observed for specimens 14 and 15. It should be emphasized that the miniature specimens taken from large grains can be single crystals, such as specimens 3, 4, 6 and 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%