2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-25951-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Inference of Natural Level Mappings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We follow a global approach to termination, i.e., require the existence of a function (level mapping) decreasing along all possible computation paths. A related technique of using two level-mappings has been recently investigated in [11]. The main difference is that Martin and King use the two level mappings separately for two different goals, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We follow a global approach to termination, i.e., require the existence of a function (level mapping) decreasing along all possible computation paths. A related technique of using two level-mappings has been recently investigated in [11]. The main difference is that Martin and King use the two level mappings separately for two different goals, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the norm is used to define interargument relations, while the level mapping ensures rigidity and decrease. Further distinction between these two different functionalities has led to the recent work on "two level mappings approach" of Martin and King (2004). From the practical point of view, however, defining the level mapping | · | in terms of the norm · has an important advantage.…”
Section: Termination Analysis Of Logic Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%