2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2015.7178282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the importance of using high resolution images, third level features and sequence of images for fingerprint spoof detection

Abstract: The successful and widespread deployment of biometric systems brings on a new challenge: the spoofing, which in volves presenting an artificial or fake biometric trait to the biometric systems so that unauthorized users can gain ac cess to places and/or information. We propose a fingerprint spoof detection method that uses a combination of informa tion available from pores, statistical features and fingerprint image quality to classifY the fingerprint images into live or fake. Our spoof detection algorithm com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Liveness detection methods based on characteristics of the pores are attracting the attention of the academic and industrial communities, since it is more difficult to create fake fingers simulating the position of the pores of a real fingerprint, with respect to counterfeiting only the minutia points [26]. Liveness detection methods in the literature evaluate the number of pores [14,36,45], statistical features [21,31,45], Euclidean distance [36], and quality indexes [36,45].…”
Section: Extraction Of Pores From Fingerprint Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liveness detection methods based on characteristics of the pores are attracting the attention of the academic and industrial communities, since it is more difficult to create fake fingers simulating the position of the pores of a real fingerprint, with respect to counterfeiting only the minutia points [26]. Liveness detection methods in the literature evaluate the number of pores [14,36,45], statistical features [21,31,45], Euclidean distance [36], and quality indexes [36,45].…”
Section: Extraction Of Pores From Fingerprint Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, antispoofing methods based on Level 3 features have been recently gaining popularity, since the position and size of the pores is more difficult to counterfeit, with respect to the ridge structure and the minutiae [36]. In this context, several methods use statistical features [37]- [39], NIST NFIQ quality indexes [37], [40], Euclidean distance between pores [40], or the number of pores [37], [40], [41].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, currently only Level 1 or Level 2 features have been used for recognition [16], and no approach has been yet proposed for a touchless fingerprint recognition using Level 3 features. The use of such features could help in implementing liveness-based antispoofing methods [24] and in improving the recognition accuracy in touchless fingerprint recognition systems. In some cases, a reduction in the EER up to 20% has been obtained by combining Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 features [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification scheme based on SVM, GMM, Gaussian Copula and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis is used to classify whether the input fingerprint is coming from live person or not. Murilo et al [13] combined fingerprint level3 feature, statistical features and image quality features to detect the spoofing. The pore frequency and number of pores are calculated.…”
Section: B Fingerprint Anti-spoofingmentioning
confidence: 99%