2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10710-020-09377-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the importance of specialists for lexicase selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The disadvantage here is that the structural information of the training data is lost due to the compression to a single fitness value [43]. Contrary, with lexicase selection [44], [45], the information of the individual training cases is used. For the selection of a solution, the training cases are shuffled and every solution in the population is evaluated on the first one.…”
Section: A Stack-based Gpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The disadvantage here is that the structural information of the training data is lost due to the compression to a single fitness value [43]. Contrary, with lexicase selection [44], [45], the information of the individual training cases is used. For the selection of a solution, the training cases are shuffled and every solution in the population is evaluated on the first one.…”
Section: A Stack-based Gpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using PushGP, lexicase selection variants have been in recent work often compared to other selection methods (e.g., tournament selection) and achieved best success rates on many program synthesis benchmark problems [16], [29], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50], [51], [52], [53], [45].…”
Section: A Stack-based Gpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations