2019
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7549-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the importance of NNLO QCD and isospin-breaking corrections in $$\varepsilon '/\varepsilon $$

Abstract: Following the 1999 analysis of Gambino, Haisch and one of us, we stress that all the recent NLO analyses of ε /ε in the Standard Model (SM) suffer from the renormalization scheme dependence present in the electroweak penguin contributions as well as from scale uncertainties in them related to the matching scale µ W and in particular to µ t in m t (µ t ). We also reemphasize the important role of isospin-breaking and QED effects in the evaluation of ε /ε. Omitting all these effects, as done in the 2015 analysis… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
61
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of isospin breaking contributions in the lattice calculations has been further scrutinized in[80] 5. A very recent update based on a detailed reassessment of the isospin breaking effects leads to ε /ε = 14 ± 5 × 10 −4[81].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of isospin breaking contributions in the lattice calculations has been further scrutinized in[80] 5. A very recent update based on a detailed reassessment of the isospin breaking effects leads to ε /ε = 14 ± 5 × 10 −4[81].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…which is now more than 2σ above the central value (9) of ChPT. We emphasize that the lower numerical result obtained in [19] and recalled in (11) mostly originates from the input values available at that time for the parameters in (17) and (20), namely R = 45.5 and θ = −22 • , respectively. In this phenomenological approach, uncertainties on (22) are basically due to our assumption expressed at the begining of this section and seem difficult to assess.…”
Section: Update Of a Simple η − η Pole Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Meanwhile we note that the excited-state contamination seen at 1.5 GeV in LQCD data might be residual effects of the scalar resonance at O( p 2 , 0) and meson evolution at O( p 0 , 1/N ), those being essential for the estimate of the Q 6 hadronic matrix elements around 1 GeV in DQCD. Now isospin-breaking effects as well as NNLO QCD corrections to Wilson coefficients of penguin operators, all absent in the RBC-UKQCD result quoted above, lower the SM predition for ε /ε [17]. Extracting the hadronic matrix elements from [16], using the estimate of the isospinbreaking effects from [11] and including the missing NNLO QCD corrections to electroweak penguin contributions, the authors in [18] find…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, Kaon physics has still a lot to offer. In particular the ratio ε /ε [19], that describes the amount of direct CP violation in K L → ππ decays relative to the indirect one, still allows for significant NP contributions and this also applies to rare Kaon decays K + → π + νν and K L → π 0 νν.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%