2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3338812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Impact of Risky Private and Public Returns in the Private Provision of Public Goods - the Case of Social Investments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Loss‐averse individuals (Kahneman & Tversky 1979, Tversky & Kahneman 1991) may consider it more difficult to cooperate in these environments than in others where returns are certain. Many scholars explored the influence of risk on prosocial behavior in different settings such as risk preferences over own and social risk (Harrison et al., 2013), private and public investment dimensions (Freundt & Lange, 2019), ambiguity (Björk et al., 2016), and time preferences (Andersen et al., 2008). The striking point is that risk discourages cooperative behavior.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loss‐averse individuals (Kahneman & Tversky 1979, Tversky & Kahneman 1991) may consider it more difficult to cooperate in these environments than in others where returns are certain. Many scholars explored the influence of risk on prosocial behavior in different settings such as risk preferences over own and social risk (Harrison et al., 2013), private and public investment dimensions (Freundt & Lange, 2019), ambiguity (Björk et al., 2016), and time preferences (Andersen et al., 2008). The striking point is that risk discourages cooperative behavior.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%