2006
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/39/42/l01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the identification of quasiprimary scaling operators in local scale-invariance

Abstract: Abstract. The relationship between physical observables defined in lattice models and the associated (quasi-)primary scaling operators of the underlying field-theory is revisited. In the context of local scale-invariance, we argue that this relationship is only defined up to a time-dependent amplitude and derive the corresponding generalizations of predictions for two-time response and correlation functions. Applications to nonequilibrium critical dynamics of several systems, with a fully disordered initial st… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
119
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(64 reference statements)
17
119
3
Order By: Relevance
“…(See, e.g., figure 2 in [10].) On the other hand, the field-theoretical results presented here are free from numerical artefacts and corrections to scaling, which were invoked in [11] to explain the findings of [10].…”
Section: Comparison With Lsimentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(See, e.g., figure 2 in [10].) On the other hand, the field-theoretical results presented here are free from numerical artefacts and corrections to scaling, which were invoked in [11] to explain the findings of [10].…”
Section: Comparison With Lsimentioning
confidence: 71%
“…A more general version of LSI [11] -the version we shall refer to in this paper -improved considerably the agreement with simulations while the disagreement with field-theoretical predictions remained. Also in the case of the CP, numerical results indicate that the scaling function f R predicted by LSI is incorrect for t ≃ s [10,11]. It was suggested in [11,23] that one could possibly account for this discrepancy by extending LSI to include also the case of a nonvanishing average of the order parameter (in the present version a vanishing order parameter is implicitly assumed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations