2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.499462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the identification of Preisach measures

Abstract: The phenomenon of hysteresis is commonly encountered in the study of magnetic materials. The Preisach operator and its variants have been successfully used in the modeling of a physical system with hysteresis. In an application, one has to determine a density function for the Preisach operator using the input-output behavior of the system at hand. In this paper, we describe a method for numerically determining an approximation of the density function when there is not enough experimental data to uniquely solve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a prelude, we state the following theorem which is Theorem 5.24.8 from [13]. (15) and (16). The integral operator given by (17) is then a compact operator.…”
Section: Y(e) = Kq(e)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a prelude, we state the following theorem which is Theorem 5.24.8 from [13]. (15) and (16). The integral operator given by (17) is then a compact operator.…”
Section: Y(e) = Kq(e)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three approaches are homogenized energy models [8, 10, 18-20, 24, 25], Preisach formulations [2,3,5,7,16,26], and domain wall models [6,8,14,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For general characterization, the weight or measure ν can be estimated from measured data through techniques analogous to those described in [27,28]. The advantage of the Preisach methodology lies in its generality.…”
Section: Preisach Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For conditions in which thermal after-effects [2] are negligible, the local average magnetization M at the lattice level is determined by minimizing the Gibbs relations (26) or (27) whereas the Gibbs energy must be balanced with the thermal energy through Boltzmann principles if thermal effects are significant. We consider these two regimes in Sections 3.1.1 and 3.1.2 and then illustrate in Section 3.1.3 that the model which incorporates thermal energy limits to the case of no thermal activation when reference volumes V are taken to be arbitrarily large.…”
Section: Local Magnetizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of modeling strategies for these compounds have been proposed but three stand out in the sense that they provide unified frameworks for characterizing hysteresis in ferroelectric, ferromagnetic and ferroelastic materials, which are collectively referred to as ferroic compounds. These three approaches are the following: (i) homogenized free energy models [9,13,18], (ii) Preisach formulations [1,2,12,19], and (iii) domain wall models [6,8,11,14,15]. The first two are formulated as integral equations whereas the domain wall models are typically posed as differential equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%