2016
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the I–II mixed mode fracture of granite using four‐point bend specimen

Abstract: Four‐point bend experiments on black granite are conducted. The fracture behaviours of granite under pure mode I, pure mode II and I–II mixed mode are investigated, and the corresponding stress intensity factors KI , KII and the non‐singular term T‐stress are obtained through numerical–experimental method. The results are compared with the theoretical predictions of generalized maximum tangential stress criterion and other conventional criteria. It shows that generalized maximum tangential stress criterion fit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in many cases, considering only the first nonsingular term in the fracture criterion does not lead to the more precise predictions (see, for example, GMTS criterion by Smith et al). It is frequently observed that one needs to add more nonsingular terms to obtain accurate results when using stress‐based fracture criteria (see, for example, Aliha et al, Wang et al, and Saghafi et al). One of the reasons of not obtaining a proper prediction results could be neglecting the effect of material properties (ie, Poisson ratio) in the fracture criterion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many cases, considering only the first nonsingular term in the fracture criterion does not lead to the more precise predictions (see, for example, GMTS criterion by Smith et al). It is frequently observed that one needs to add more nonsingular terms to obtain accurate results when using stress‐based fracture criteria (see, for example, Aliha et al, Wang et al, and Saghafi et al). One of the reasons of not obtaining a proper prediction results could be neglecting the effect of material properties (ie, Poisson ratio) in the fracture criterion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of the SIF‐based criterion by Dong was also coupled with the maximum circumferential stress criterion to investigate mixed mode I–II fracture in concrete . In addition, a generalized maximum tangential stress criterion considering T‐stress was also employed to analyse the fracture of granite under four‐point bend loading . However, all studies mentioned earlier do not pertain to specimens with blunt notches or U‐notches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy approach, Equation , is traceable to Irwin, see, eg, . It may also be written in terms of J , eg, or G , eg, : Keq=KI2+KII2. …”
Section: Review Of the Concept Of Equivalent Stress Intensity Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Richard remarks that the choice of the geometry for a mixed mode fracture mechanics specimen should bear in mind the following aspects: full range of mode I/mode II combinations, specimen compactness, ease of manufacture, possibility of precracking under mode I, clamping and loading easy to accomplish, simple test procedure and evaluation, possibility of plane stress or plane strain, small fracture loads. Three‐point and four‐point bend specimens, traditionally used for mode I studies, may be used for mixed mode I‐II choosing adequate relative locations for loads and crack plane. Figures and present the case of three‐point and four‐point bending specimens; K I and K II stress intensity factor calibrations are given, eg, in Wang et al and Belli et al, respectively.…”
Section: Planar Specimens For Mixed Mode Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%