2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dam.2016.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the hyperbolicity of bipartite graphs and intersection graphs

Abstract: International audienceHyperbolicity is a measure of the tree-likeness of a graph from a metric perspective. Recently , it has been used to classify complex networks depending on their underlying geometry. Motivated by a better understanding of the structure of graphs with bounded hyperbolicity, we here investigate on the hyperbolicity of bipartite graphs. More precisely, given a bipartite graph B = (V0 ∪ V1 , E) we prove it is enough to consider any one side Vi of the bipartition of B to obtain a close approxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
10
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, for line, clique and biclique graphs, and some extensions of line graphs (incidence, total, middle and k-edge graphs). Hence, the results in [18] are different from the results in this paper. Furthermore, the bounds in [18] refer to the hyperbolicity constant with respect to the four-point definition of hyperbolicity; the inequalities for the hyperbolicity constant with respect to a definition can be translated to the hyperbolicity constant with respect to another definition, with additional multiplicative and/or additive constants (for instance, multiplying or dividing by 3 the initial upper or lower bound, respectively).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, for line, clique and biclique graphs, and some extensions of line graphs (incidence, total, middle and k-edge graphs). Hence, the results in [18] are different from the results in this paper. Furthermore, the bounds in [18] refer to the hyperbolicity constant with respect to the four-point definition of hyperbolicity; the inequalities for the hyperbolicity constant with respect to a definition can be translated to the hyperbolicity constant with respect to another definition, with additional multiplicative and/or additive constants (for instance, multiplying or dividing by 3 the initial upper or lower bound, respectively).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…Hence, the results in [18] are different from the results in this paper. Furthermore, the bounds in [18] refer to the hyperbolicity constant with respect to the four-point definition of hyperbolicity; the inequalities for the hyperbolicity constant with respect to a definition can be translated to the hyperbolicity constant with respect to another definition, with additional multiplicative and/or additive constants (for instance, multiplying or dividing by 3 the initial upper or lower bound, respectively). But note that it is not difficult to check that circular-arc graphs are hyperbolic; for a fixed definition of hyperbolicity, the challenge is to obtain sharp bounds for the hyperbolicity constant.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hyperbolicity of the line graph has been studied previously (see [21][22][23]). We have the following results.…”
Section: Corollary 2 For Any Graph G We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of Gromov hyperbolic graphs is a subject of increasing interest in graph theory; see, e.g., [4,11,17,18,19,21,22,23,24,27,28,30,31,34,36,46,50,52] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%