2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the hierarchical nature of means–end relationships in laddering data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Laddering is a valuable method especially for the exploratory stages of research projects (van Rekom and Wierenga, 2007). The technique has been used widely, originally for brand or product positioning issues (Gutman, 1982;Olson and Reynolds, 1983), and recently in research areas such as sales management (Deeter-Schmelz et al, 2008), services marketing 2009ab), higher education services (Voss et al, 2007), business-tobusiness marketing (Henneberg et al, 2009), health services (Gruber and Frugone, 2011), and ethical clothing consumption (Jaegel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodology -Using Laddering To Investigate Satisfying Servimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laddering is a valuable method especially for the exploratory stages of research projects (van Rekom and Wierenga, 2007). The technique has been used widely, originally for brand or product positioning issues (Gutman, 1982;Olson and Reynolds, 1983), and recently in research areas such as sales management (Deeter-Schmelz et al, 2008), services marketing 2009ab), higher education services (Voss et al, 2007), business-tobusiness marketing (Henneberg et al, 2009), health services (Gruber and Frugone, 2011), and ethical clothing consumption (Jaegel et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodology -Using Laddering To Investigate Satisfying Servimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the consequences of doing this is that the hierarchy assumption, which assumes a hierarchical ordering of the different categories in terms of abstractness, is dropped, and that the presence or absence of hierarchy in a meaning network becomes an empirical matter. Van Rekom and Wierenga (2007) have investigated this hierarchy assumption in meansend theory, and for the cases they studied the hierarchy assumption had to be rejected. Moreover, as Cohen and Warlop (2001) have argued, in many research situations one does not have to assume hierarchy in means-end relations at all in order to achieve meaningful and relevant answers to research questions.…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as suggested by ValetteFlorence and Rapacchi (1991), the paper-and-pencil method can lead to various omissions and errors. In addition, Van Rekom and Wierenga (2007) have recently shown that meaning structures are not necessarily hierarchical in nature, and that for non-hierarchical meaning structures a network representation is more appropriate. Up to now we have only presented meaning networks of separate housing features.…”
Section: Some New Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an inexpensive and fast data collection method is a valuable research method especially for the exploratory stages of research projects (Van Rekom and Wierenga, 2007). Given the exploratory character of the study, the findings are tentative in nature and cannot be generalised.…”
Section: Conclusion Implications and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%