2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the guidance, navigation and control of in-orbit space robotic missions: A survey and prospective vision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 215 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Operating in this regime comes with the complexities associated with the GNC design of underactuated systems [42,16]. In this case, the coupled dynamics between the spacecraft and manipulator motion and the mitigation of the uncontrolled base motion are the key considerations [12,15,27]. Common control strategies consider reducing the coupled base motion during manipulator operation [3,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operating in this regime comes with the complexities associated with the GNC design of underactuated systems [42,16]. In this case, the coupled dynamics between the spacecraft and manipulator motion and the mitigation of the uncontrolled base motion are the key considerations [12,15,27]. Common control strategies consider reducing the coupled base motion during manipulator operation [3,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The concepts of on-orbit servicing (OOS), miniaturization, and reusability of space assets are leading a change of paradigm in the space sector, which demands a even higher level of system autonomy and capability to react and adapt to different working conditions. 2 A typical example of such new scenarios is the case of a large carrier spacecraft with the task to release in different target orbits several passenger satellites: 3,4 at each release, mass and moment of inertia of the carrier suddenly change, with the system required to react without losses in pointing accuracy. The concept of OOS, in which a servicer spacecraft performs different tasks to prolong the lifetime of several target satellites, such as tugging, refueling, station keeping or even mechanical maintenance, requires the attitude control to be robust to a varying inertia in order to keep the system stable in all the different maneuvers: the servicer can acts alone or connected with the target, is required to perform complex grasping maneuvers to achieve connection, and it needs to handle the satellite stack even during mass transfers like refueling activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Space missions are increasingly becoming more elaborate and are going to require stringent performance in terms of control and robustness to disturbs and uncertainties, especially due to the presence of inherently variable systems such as robotic arms and tools 1 . The concepts of on‐orbit servicing (OOS), miniaturization, and reusability of space assets are leading a change of paradigm in the space sector, which demands a even higher level of system autonomy and capability to react and adapt to different working conditions 2 . A typical example of such new scenarios is the case of a large carrier spacecraft with the task to release in different target orbits several passenger satellites: 3,4 at each release, mass and moment of inertia of the carrier suddenly change, with the system required to react without losses in pointing accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the coupled dynamics between the spacecraft and manipulator motions and the mitigation of the uncontrolled base motion are key considerations in the design of free-floating GNC systems [42,43]. During capture manoeuvres, it is widely suggested for a spacecraft's control system to be removed at the moment of contact between the end-effector and the target [44]. This is necessary for mitigating the potentially damaging behaviours which may be performed by the controlled servicer.…”
Section: Gnc Of Single-arm Free-floating Space Manipulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trajectory designs involved with capture manoeuvres (including either free-flying or free-floating systems) primarily focus on defining an end-effector's linear and angular velocity throughout the pre-capture operation, and at the grasping interface [44]. One of the primary issues in executing trajectories in a free-floating manipulator's workspace is the consequent non-zero motion of the base (due to its uncontrolled nature), causing the base's position and orientation at the grasping point not to be unique (i.e., different workspace trajectories to a target point result in different trajectories of the base) [53].…”
Section: Gnc Of Single-arm Free-floating Space Manipulatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%