2010
DOI: 10.1051/ita/2010012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the growth rates of complexity of threshold languages

Abstract: Threshold languages, which are the (k/(k−1)) + -free languages over k-letter alphabets with k ≥ 5, are the minimal infinite power-free languages according to Dejean's conjecture, which is now proved for all alphabets. We study the growth properties of these languages. On the base of obtained structural properties and computerassisted studies we conjecture that the growth rate of complexity of the threshold language over k letters tends to a constantα ≈ 1.242 as k tends to infinity.Mathematics Subject Classific… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially this was part of our strategy. Unfortunately, our experience supports the conjecture in [17], that the number of these words grows approximately as 1.24 r (independently of n). -free words and satisfied the algebraic condition; this allowed us to verify the claim of [13] that the morphisms presented therein for 5 ≤ n ≤ 11 are shortest possible 'convenient morphisms'; the uniforms are all uniform, with lengths around 4n − 4 in each case.…”
Section: η | |π|supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Initially this was part of our strategy. Unfortunately, our experience supports the conjecture in [17], that the number of these words grows approximately as 1.24 r (independently of n). -free words and satisfied the algebraic condition; this allowed us to verify the claim of [13] that the morphisms presented therein for 5 ≤ n ≤ 11 are shortest possible 'convenient morphisms'; the uniforms are all uniform, with lengths around 4n − 4 in each case.…”
Section: η | |π|supporting
confidence: 82%
“…It is not obvious that this is even possible: indeed it might be that RT (k) = RT (k) for k ≥ 3 (where the threshold RT (k), introduced by Kobayashi [13], is such that the growth is polynomial when RT (k) < α < RT (k), and not polynomial when α > RT (k); Lemma 1 states that RT (2) = 7/3) and there is no more polynomial growth. This is conjectured by Shur [20], and supported by some numerical evidence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…. , 60 letters we observed in [12] that the sequence {α(T (3) k )} demonstrates fast convergence to the limit ≈1.242096777.…”
Section: Theorem 1 ( [12]) For Any Integer M ≥ 3 There Exists a Setmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Any threshold language can be approximated from above by a series of regular languages consisting of words that locally satisfy the (k/(k−1)) + -freeness property. Namely, these words avoid all (k/(k−1)) + -powers w such that |w| − per(w) ≤ m, for some constant m. From our previous work [12], it is clear that the case m = 3 gives a lot of important structural information about the languages T k . Here we study this case in details, using cylindric representation that captures the properties common for considered words over all alphabets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation