1990
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9169(90)90110-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the global atmospheric electrical circuit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The field is quasi-static if its temporal variation exceeds considerably the relaxation time (τ) of charges in the surface atmosphere τ~ε 0 /σ~10~30 min (ε 0 is the permittivity of free space, and σ is the surface atmosphere conductivity). An equivalent circuit is often used to explain the generation of atmospheric electric field (Goldberg, 1984;Sapkota & Varshneya, 1990;Rycroft et al, 2000). The current flowing in the circuit is excited by a generator which is the resultant action of thunderstorms all over the world.…”
Section: Penetration Of DC Electric Field Into the Ionospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field is quasi-static if its temporal variation exceeds considerably the relaxation time (τ) of charges in the surface atmosphere τ~ε 0 /σ~10~30 min (ε 0 is the permittivity of free space, and σ is the surface atmosphere conductivity). An equivalent circuit is often used to explain the generation of atmospheric electric field (Goldberg, 1984;Sapkota & Varshneya, 1990;Rycroft et al, 2000). The current flowing in the circuit is excited by a generator which is the resultant action of thunderstorms all over the world.…”
Section: Penetration Of DC Electric Field Into the Ionospherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The space charge is given by = n + − n − and the total ion concentration by n = n + + n − . The responses of n, Jz and Ez in the global circuit to changes in GCR ux have been modeled by Roble and Hays (1979), Ogawa (1983, 1985), Tzur et al (1983), Sapkota and Varshneya (1990). Observations are sparse and noisy, and have been reviewed by Tinsley (1996) (see also Reiter, 1992, Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Also, Makino and Ogawa [11] improved their earlier model by incorporating the latitudinal, longitudinal, and height variations of conductivity. Sapkota and Varshneya [12] estimated the response of the global circuit to the Forbush decrease in cosmic ray flux. But 2 ISRN High Energy Physics the calculations of Makino and Ogawa [11] and Sapkota and Varshneya [12] were performed on the global basis in a grid of 5 ∘ both in latitude and longitude.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sapkota and Varshneya [12] estimated the response of the global circuit to the Forbush decrease in cosmic ray flux. But 2 ISRN High Energy Physics the calculations of Makino and Ogawa [11] and Sapkota and Varshneya [12] were performed on the global basis in a grid of 5 ∘ both in latitude and longitude. Agarwal and Varshneya [13] made calculations for GEC parameters by taking the latitudinal variation factor due to cosmic rays as 0.4 for clean and clear atmosphere, but they took orography of Indian subcontinent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%