2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bulsci.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Gieseker Harder–Narasimhan filtration for principal bundles

Abstract: Abstract. We give an example of an orthogonal bundle where the Harder-Narasimhan filtration, with respect to Gieseker semistability, of its underlying vector bundle does not correspond to any parabolic reduction of the orthogonal bundle. A similar example is given for the symplectic case.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been partial attempts to construct a filtration that accounts for all of the terms in the Hilbert polynomial in lower rank [Zam16]. On the other hand, in [BZ16] it was shown that the notion of Gieseker Harder-Narasimhan parabolic reduction cannot be related to the Gieseker-Harder-Narasimhan filtration of the underlying vector bundles for faithful representations, which meant that the main strategies in the literature (e.g. [AAB02]) could not possibly apply if we try to account for all terms of the Hilbert polynomial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been partial attempts to construct a filtration that accounts for all of the terms in the Hilbert polynomial in lower rank [Zam16]. On the other hand, in [BZ16] it was shown that the notion of Gieseker Harder-Narasimhan parabolic reduction cannot be related to the Gieseker-Harder-Narasimhan filtration of the underlying vector bundles for faithful representations, which meant that the main strategies in the literature (e.g. [AAB02]) could not possibly apply if we try to account for all terms of the Hilbert polynomial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%