Abstract:We investigate projective varieties which are binary symmetric models of trivalent phylogenetic trees. We prove that they have Gorenstein terminal singularities and are Fano varieties of index 4 and dimension equal to the number of edges of the tree in question. Moreover any two such varieties which are of the same dimension are deformation equivalent, that is, they are in the same connected component of the Hilbert scheme of the projective space. As an application we provide a simple formula for computing the… Show more
“…Using this procedure on any (T * , e * , ω T * ), and (T , e, ω T ) for any edge e ∈ T , can create a new weighted tree by identifying the new 0-weighted edges. On the level of the combinatorics of the trees, this construction is called the graft of two pointed trees, and was introduced in Definition 2.25 of [3]. An example is pictured in Figure 17.…”
Section: Necessity Of Degree 3 Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this resemblance is not entirely accidental, see [5] for a moduli-of-surfaces interpretation of spaces associated to the semigroup S T . Buczynska and Wisniewski define merging in [3], where they show that a similar fibered product formula holds for a class of semigroups of weightings which we will now introduce.…”
Section: Proposition 13 Let T Be a Trivalent Tree If R Has An Odd Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in [3] (proposition 1.13) that (T ) is a fibered product of |I (T )| copies of (Y ). The lattice point semigroup of L (T ) = (T ) + .…”
Section: Definition 14 For a Trivalent Tree T Let (T ) Be The Polytomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe that the lattice points of (Y ) are given by the degree 1 members of S 1 Y . In [3] Buczynska and Wisniewski study the algebras C[S 1 T ], proving that they are all deformation equivalent. However, they do not construct an analogue of the projective coordinate ring of the Grassmannian of two planes in this context, namely an algebra for each n which flatly degenerates to the semigroup algebra C[S 1 T ] for each tree T with n leaves while preserving the multigrading defined by the edge weights and the level.…”
Section: This Last Condition Is Referred To As the Level Conditionmentioning
We study presentations for subalgebras of invariants of the coordinate algebras of binary symmetric models of phylogenetic trees studied by Buczynska and Wisniewski in (J. Eur. Math. Soc. 9:609-635, 2007). These algebras arise as toric degenerations of projective coordinate rings of the moduli of weighted points on the projective line, and projective coordinate rings of the moduli of quasiparabolic semisimple rank two bundles on the projective line.
“…Using this procedure on any (T * , e * , ω T * ), and (T , e, ω T ) for any edge e ∈ T , can create a new weighted tree by identifying the new 0-weighted edges. On the level of the combinatorics of the trees, this construction is called the graft of two pointed trees, and was introduced in Definition 2.25 of [3]. An example is pictured in Figure 17.…”
Section: Necessity Of Degree 3 Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this resemblance is not entirely accidental, see [5] for a moduli-of-surfaces interpretation of spaces associated to the semigroup S T . Buczynska and Wisniewski define merging in [3], where they show that a similar fibered product formula holds for a class of semigroups of weightings which we will now introduce.…”
Section: Proposition 13 Let T Be a Trivalent Tree If R Has An Odd Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is shown in [3] (proposition 1.13) that (T ) is a fibered product of |I (T )| copies of (Y ). The lattice point semigroup of L (T ) = (T ) + .…”
Section: Definition 14 For a Trivalent Tree T Let (T ) Be The Polytomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observe that the lattice points of (Y ) are given by the degree 1 members of S 1 Y . In [3] Buczynska and Wisniewski study the algebras C[S 1 T ], proving that they are all deformation equivalent. However, they do not construct an analogue of the projective coordinate ring of the Grassmannian of two planes in this context, namely an algebra for each n which flatly degenerates to the semigroup algebra C[S 1 T ] for each tree T with n leaves while preserving the multigrading defined by the edge weights and the level.…”
Section: This Last Condition Is Referred To As the Level Conditionmentioning
We study presentations for subalgebras of invariants of the coordinate algebras of binary symmetric models of phylogenetic trees studied by Buczynska and Wisniewski in (J. Eur. Math. Soc. 9:609-635, 2007). These algebras arise as toric degenerations of projective coordinate rings of the moduli of weighted points on the projective line, and projective coordinate rings of the moduli of quasiparabolic semisimple rank two bundles on the projective line.
“…On the theoretical side of phylogenetics, they have been used to answer questions about identifiability (e.g., [3,37]). The study of the algebraic geometry arising from invariants has led to many interesting problems in mathematics [18,9,15].…”
Abstract. Phylogenetic invariants are certain polynomials in the joint probability distribution of a Markov model on a phylogenetic tree. Such polynomials are of theoretical interest in the field of algebraic statistics and they are also of practical interest-they can be used to construct phylogenetic trees. This paper is a self-contained introduction to the algebraic, statistical, and computational challenges involved in the practical use of phylogenetic invariants. We survey the relevant literature and provide some partial answers and many open problems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.