2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00526-013-0606-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the geometry and regularity of largest subsolutions for a free boundary problem in $$\mathbf{R }^2$$ : elliptic case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Part (iv) is a straightforward barrier argument. See Orcan-Ekmekci [23] for nondegeneracy of largest subsolution in d = 2. Since the nondegeneracy of the maximal subsolution is not always a given, we will say that a maximal subsolution u is nondegenerate in a domain U if the estimate of Lemma 2.13 holds with a universal constant for every x ∈ ∂{u > 0} ∩ U and ball B r (x) ⊂ U .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part (iv) is a straightforward barrier argument. See Orcan-Ekmekci [23] for nondegeneracy of largest subsolution in d = 2. Since the nondegeneracy of the maximal subsolution is not always a given, we will say that a maximal subsolution u is nondegenerate in a domain U if the estimate of Lemma 2.13 holds with a universal constant for every x ∈ ∂{u > 0} ∩ U and ball B r (x) ⊂ U .…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the free boundary being the frontier of the positivity set {u > 0} (see Figure 1). A huge literature about free boundaries stemmed from the existence and regularity results proved in [2] (without any attempt of completeness, see for instance [3,22,20,21,30,33]). However, these papers are mainly focused on the study of local minimizers, through the Euler-Lagrange equation and the related free boundary condition, intended in the variational or in the viscosity sense.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%