1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0969-6016(97)00029-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the General Utility of Discounted Markov Decision Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as we are aware, it appears that little work has been done on the Lagrange method to general utility-constrained MDPs. The method of analysis for general utitity functions is closely related to [1,2], in which discounted MDPs have been studied with general utility function and whose results are applied to characterize a constrained optimal policy.…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as we are aware, it appears that little work has been done on the Lagrange method to general utility-constrained MDPs. The method of analysis for general utitity functions is closely related to [1,2], in which discounted MDPs have been studied with general utility function and whose results are applied to characterize a constrained optimal policy.…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the utility treatment for MDPs and constrained MDPs, refer to [1,2,[4][5][6][7] and their references.…”
Section: Introduction and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rieder [18] has treated the non-stationary and unbounded model, in which several results obtained in [8,9] have been extended and completed. Also, the general utility-treatment for stopped decision processes has been studied by Kadota et al [13,14]. In this paper, we consider the optimization problem for the stopped decision process over stopping times t constrained so that Et Y a for some ®xed a > 0 and develop mathematical programming methods to solve the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%