2004
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Galerkin formulation of the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this paper, we propose a Galerkin-based smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) formulation with moving least-squares meshless approximation, applied to free surface flows. The Galerkin scheme provides a clear framework to analyse several procedures widely used in the classical SPH literature, suggesting that some of them should be reformulated in order to develop consistent algorithms. The performance of the methodology proposed is tested through various dynamic simulations, demonstrating the attracti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of using explicit time integration schemes, time stepping stability criteria such as the CFL-condition may be rather restrictive. Moreover, since uncorrected SPH interpolation stencils lack the Kronecker delta property, the application of essential boundary conditions remains nontrivial [46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of using explicit time integration schemes, time stepping stability criteria such as the CFL-condition may be rather restrictive. Moreover, since uncorrected SPH interpolation stencils lack the Kronecker delta property, the application of essential boundary conditions remains nontrivial [46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and the derivatives of [17,16,18]. A wide variety of kernel functions appear in the literature, most of them being spline or exponential functions.…”
Section: General Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the diffuse approach, the derivatives of the shape functions are approximated by the first term in (18) as…”
Section: Diffuse Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slope limiting was carried out using (74)-(78) with either (79) or (80). First order derivatives are full derivatives (given by (18)), whereas second order derivatives were approximated by the diffuse ones (dropping the succesive derivatives of C C C C C C C C C C C C C C(x x x x x x x x x x x x x x)). The results for the second order scheme with limited gradients are shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: D Dam Break Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation