1979
DOI: 10.2307/1971244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Fundamental Series of a Real Semisimple Lie Algebra: Their Irreducibility, Resolutions and Multiplicity Formulae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus begin with some facts regarding Weyl group orbits. The next proposition is proved using the completion functors of T. Enright introduced in [3] and generalized to Kac-Moody algebras in [11]. Observe that, since the morphism of complexes in Proposition 3.8 is unique up to homotopy, the map Wk ó is independent of the choice of the morphism of complexes.…”
Section: Definition Of the Functorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We thus begin with some facts regarding Weyl group orbits. The next proposition is proved using the completion functors of T. Enright introduced in [3] and generalized to Kac-Moody algebras in [11]. Observe that, since the morphism of complexes in Proposition 3.8 is unique up to homotopy, the map Wk ó is independent of the choice of the morphism of complexes.…”
Section: Definition Of the Functorsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(w + 1)! This result is given below as Proposition 3.1 and is a mild variation of a result in [5] which concerns only invariant forms. The main result of § 3 is Theorem 3.4 which asserts that if A, Be^(m) and φ e / β (A, B) (resp.…”
Section: T J Enright and R Parthasarathymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The composite of the top maps is just the a-module action on Ca(Af) (see [E,Proposition 3.3]). Hence Ca is compatible with the a-module action and we can apply the Lifting Theorem to give us a functor Ca: ¿7g(a) -» ^(a) rendering diagram 4.7.1 commutative.…”
Section: (Continuation Of Example 33)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then by restriction of the action from g to a we obtain an o-module which we denote by the same symbol A. Within representation theory of Lie algebras the following question has arisen naturally in a number of contexts (see [D,E,Jol,Jo2,Jo3,Wa,Z]). What hypothesis on y and A are sufficient to imply that y A admits a g-module structure?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%