2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.25.22281504
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the frontlines in Shanghai: Stress, burnout and perceived benefit among COVID-19 testers and other personnel during the Omicron wave lockdown

Abstract: Background: COVID-19 control measure stringency including testing has been among the highest globally in China. Psychosocial impact on pandemic workers in Shanghai, and their pandemic-related attitudes were investigated. Methods: Participants in this cross-sectional study were healthcare providers (HCP) and other support workers. A Mandarin self-report survey was administered via Wenjuanxing between April-June 2022 during the omicron-wave lockdown. The Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and Maslach Burnout Inventory… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our earlier examination of the impact of the pandemic and associated control measures on older adults (many of whom similarly had hypertension, CVD or diabetes) in the Spring of 2020, 31 mean scores on the SSS were somewhat lower at 29/80 vs 36 herein (all mean subscale scores were somewhat lower as well). In terms of pandemic impact on life, only 6% perceived this would be permanent in 2020 vs 25% in 2022.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In our earlier examination of the impact of the pandemic and associated control measures on older adults (many of whom similarly had hypertension, CVD or diabetes) in the Spring of 2020, 31 mean scores on the SSS were somewhat lower at 29/80 vs 36 herein (all mean subscale scores were somewhat lower as well). In terms of pandemic impact on life, only 6% perceived this would be permanent in 2020 vs 25% in 2022.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%