2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.12.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the fracture statistics of open-porous alumina foam structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The samples were dried at 120 ℃ and sintered at a temperature of 1300 ℃, and detailed information is seen in Refs. [25,28,31]. In these works, the same type of specimens has already been used for compressive tests, three-point bending tests, and dynamic Young's modulus investigation.…”
Section: Charactristics Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The samples were dried at 120 ℃ and sintered at a temperature of 1300 ℃, and detailed information is seen in Refs. [25,28,31]. In these works, the same type of specimens has already been used for compressive tests, three-point bending tests, and dynamic Young's modulus investigation.…”
Section: Charactristics Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the compressive test is the most applied and assumed to be a standardized method for the ceramic foams. For example, Voigt et al [27] studied the influence of different experimental conditions on compressive strength measurements for the open-cell ceramic foams, and the statistical tools were also established for the validity examination [28].…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suitability of the Weibull distribution applied to porous ceramics was questioned [38,39]. Comparing four probability distributions, namely the Normal, Log-Normal, Weibull and Gamma to evaluate the crushing strength data of open-cell alumina foams has revealed that all distributions provide a sound representation of the data, since the differences between the goodness of fit (R 2 ) were typically below 0.025 (except for the 30 ppi CS data series) [40].…”
Section: Crushing Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%