2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77449-7_2
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Fractal Nature of Local Optima Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another engaging observation from the sampling validation attempt (Section 5.1) was that generally, sampled LON features explained more search variance than those of the enumerated LONs. This is important because the vast majority of LON research Daolio et al, 2011;Verel et al, 2011;Herrmann et al, 2016) dissected fully enumerated LONs, even using their features for algorithm performance prediction (Daolio et al, 2012;Herrmann et al, 2018;Thomson et al, 2018). Our results suggest that LON construction algorithms may approximate or infer yet unseen fitness landscapes better than best-improvement exhaustive enumeration of the local optima level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Another engaging observation from the sampling validation attempt (Section 5.1) was that generally, sampled LON features explained more search variance than those of the enumerated LONs. This is important because the vast majority of LON research Daolio et al, 2011;Verel et al, 2011;Herrmann et al, 2016) dissected fully enumerated LONs, even using their features for algorithm performance prediction (Daolio et al, 2012;Herrmann et al, 2018;Thomson et al, 2018). Our results suggest that LON construction algorithms may approximate or infer yet unseen fitness landscapes better than best-improvement exhaustive enumeration of the local optima level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While in continuous optimization a large set of features has been defined and can be computed with the flacco package [Kerschke and Trautmann(2016)], the research community currently lacks a meaningful analog for discrete optimization problems. We note though, that several advances in this direction have been made, including the above-introduced features covered by the W-model (size of the effective dimension, neutrality, epistasis, ruggedness) and the local optima networks (see [Thomson et al(2018a) Thomson, Vérel, Ochoa, Veerapen, and McMenemy, Thomson et al(2018b) Thomson, Vérel, Ochoa, Veerapen, and Cairns] and references mentioned therein). We suggest to start a first prototype using these existing features, while at the same time intensifying research efforts to find additional landscape features that can be used to characterize pseudo-Boolean optimization problems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study modified box-counting [14] for local optima networks such that fitness distance was considered as well as link distance: two nodes can be boxed together iff d(lo i , lo j ) < s and…”
Section: A Fractional Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, fractal dimensions were calculated on the LONs of a set of NK Landscape instances [14]. The box-counting algorithm used considered edge distance between nodes as a scaling factor for dimension calculation.…”
Section: Probabilistic Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation