2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10997-010-9162-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the foundation and early development of domestic and international new ventures

Abstract: The founding and early development of Domestic New Ventures and International New Ventures is examined based upon a large scale survey of Danish manufacturing firms. The firms are classified into five different categories and compared with regard to their foundation and development within the first 3 years. The article contributes with a demonstration of differences between these categories of firms with regard to the number and mindset of founders, the growth of the firm, and the networks of firm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, previous results remain on a rather descriptive level (Rasmussen et al, 2010) and do not provide an authoritative empirical evidence for this trend.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, previous results remain on a rather descriptive level (Rasmussen et al, 2010) and do not provide an authoritative empirical evidence for this trend.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This is based on the fact that demand for wave and tidal energy solutions is assumed to be very global in nature, but also on the assumption that the firms in this emerging industry have a huge need for capital as well as specialized competencies from partners which may be difficult to find in local or national environments. Based on the case studies, we will be able to describe and analyse these issues more in detail and contribute with regard to what Løvdal and Neumann (2011) and Rasmussen et al (2012) describe as an understudied part of the INV literature.…”
Section: Technology Development and Technology Partnershipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing definitions do, however, typically focus on firms that already produce and sell their product or service. Rasmussen, Madsen & Servais (2012) state that there has been limited attention to the sourcing side of INVs/BGs and that few studies on the pre-sale phase have been published (Rasmussen, Madsen, & Servais, 2012).The lack of focus on the early phase before sales activities is surprising since authors generally agree that a venture's future internationalization activities and processes are heavily influenced by decisions made close to and before inception (Aspelund et al, 2007;Boter & Holmquist, 1996;Madsen & Servais, 1997;Sapienza, Autio, George, & Zahra, 2006). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies are aimed at identifying the reasons at the basis of the emergence of the INVs, such as the role of the founder/ entrepreneur and the management team (Bloodgood et al 1996;Carpenter et al 2003;Kundu and Katz 2003;Spence et al 2011;Rasmussen et al 2012), and the importance of knowledge-based resources and capabilities (Oviatt and McDougall 1995;Sharma and Blomstermo 2003;Coviello 2006;Freeman et al 2012;Khalid and Larimo 2012;Fernhaber 2013). Fewer studies have been conducted with the specific purpose to analyze the determinants of INVs' performance (McDougall and Oviatt 1996;Autio et al 2000;Zahra et al 2000;Sleuwaegen and Onkelinx 2014;Zhou and Wu 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%