An Anthology of Nineteenth-Century American Science Writing 2012
DOI: 10.7135/upo9780857286512.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“On the Fossil Horses of America,” Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia (1847)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synonymy. Oromys aesopi (Leidy, 1853); Hydrochoerus aesopi (Leidy, 1856); Hydrochoerus magnus (Gervais and Ameghino, 1880); Hydrochoerus robustus (Leidy, 1887); Hydrochoerus holmesi (Simpson, 1928); Neochoerus magnus (Kraglievich, 1930); Neochoerus robustus (Kraglievich, 1930); Prohydrochoerus sirasakae (Spillmann, 1941); Protohydrochoerus schirasakae [sic] (Spillmann, 1948); Neochoerus (Neochoerus) sirasakae (Hoffstteter, 1952); Neochoerus sirasakae (Mones, 1975b); Neochoerus pinckneyi (Mones, 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synonymy. Oromys aesopi (Leidy, 1853); Hydrochoerus aesopi (Leidy, 1856); Hydrochoerus magnus (Gervais and Ameghino, 1880); Hydrochoerus robustus (Leidy, 1887); Hydrochoerus holmesi (Simpson, 1928); Neochoerus magnus (Kraglievich, 1930); Neochoerus robustus (Kraglievich, 1930); Prohydrochoerus sirasakae (Spillmann, 1941); Protohydrochoerus schirasakae [sic] (Spillmann, 1948); Neochoerus (Neochoerus) sirasakae (Hoffstteter, 1952); Neochoerus sirasakae (Mones, 1975b); Neochoerus pinckneyi (Mones, 1991).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, ingroup taxa originated from the results of the valid species analyses and include: Hoplophoneus primaevus (Leidy 1851), H. occidentalis (Leidy 1866), H. dakotensis (Hatcher 1895), H. oharrai (Jepsen 1926), H. sicarius (Sinclair & Jepsen 1927), H. cerebralis (Cope 1880a), Nimravus brachyops (Cope 1878), Pogonodon platycopis (Cope 1879c), P. davisi (Merriam 1906), Dinictis felina (Leidy 1854), Dinaelurus crassus (Eaton 1922), and Nanosmilus kurteni (Martin 1992). Hoplophoneus dakotensis was partially scored from literature, due to inaccessibility of specimens (Jepsen 1933;Peigné 2003).…”
Section: Ingroup Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referred Taxa "Machairodus" primaevus (Leidy 1851) "Drepanodon" primaevus (Leidy 1857) "Machaerodus" oreodontis (Cope 1873) Hoplophoneus oreodontis (Cope 1874) Hoplophoneus primaevus (Cope 1879b) Hoplophoneus robustus (Adams 1896a) Hoplophoneus insolens (Adams 1896a) Hoplophoneus marshi (Thorpe 1920) Hoplophoneus latidens (Thorpe 1920) Hoplophoneus molossus (Thorpe 1920) Hoplophoneus mentalis (Sinclair 1921) Hoplophoneus primaevus primaevus (Hough 1949) Hoplophoneus primaevus latidens (Hough 1949) Type-USNM 99, cranium and partial dentary. Diagnosis -Characters of Hoplophoneus plus: sutural contact absent between the lacrimal and jugal; medial ridge of palate present; postglenoid foramen present; posterior lip of the glenoid socket projects more ventrally than the anterior lip; oblique angle between the braincase, disregarding the sagittal crest, and axial plane of the cranium; anterior dentary position elevate above cheek tooth row; vertically orientated posterior border of coronoid process; deep genial flange between 32 and 50% of total dentary length; mesial-distal length of C1 less than that of P4; ratio of height between P3 and P4 0.50 to 0.70; p3 lower than p4; trigonid proportion of m1, 88% or greater.…”
Section: Hoplophoneus Primaevus (Leidy 1851)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations