2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00161-019-00781-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the formulation of elastic and electroelastic gradient beam theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 12 shows a stroboscopic image of the motion of the duoskelion structure. 7 As for the previously reported cases, Figures 11 and 12 show that, after some small initial vibrations, there is a sudden buckling and the slope of the displacement increases rapidly. Looking at Figure 12, it is possible to notice that the initial vibrations are mainly due to an extensional deformation mode and that, following buckling, the first (bending) mode is activated, at least initially.…”
Section: Influence Of the Loading Ratesupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 12 shows a stroboscopic image of the motion of the duoskelion structure. 7 As for the previously reported cases, Figures 11 and 12 show that, after some small initial vibrations, there is a sudden buckling and the slope of the displacement increases rapidly. Looking at Figure 12, it is possible to notice that the initial vibrations are mainly due to an extensional deformation mode and that, following buckling, the first (bending) mode is activated, at least initially.…”
Section: Influence Of the Loading Ratesupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Recent research in the field of metamaterials [1][2][3] has stimulated the rediscovery and improvement of previously developed models of structural elements-such as beams [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], plates [13][14][15][16], shells [17][18][19][20][21], and solids [22][23][24]-which have been adapted to study the exotic mechanical behaviors exhibited by metamaterials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is notable that if we use the Variant I of the surface boundary conditions (29) and neglect the edge boundary conditions (33), then the SGET solution will coincide with the classical one. 61 This classical polynomial solution is directly included into the system of trial functions that follows from the Papkovich-Neuber representation (12), (17), such that the Trefftz solution will coincide with the analytical one. Nevertheless, for the full correct statement of the problem with the edge boundary conditions, the SGET solution deviates from the classical one.…”
Section: Square Domain Under Bendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting equivalent elastic modulus  b is 60.39 GPa. For this choice of material and geometric properties, the analytical solution 61 of the displacements for a simply supported beam with uniform load in the absence of a piezoelectric effect, the displacement at mid-span is 2.156 × 10 −4 m. The elastic stiffness of the beam will be increased by the piezoelectric effect with the effective elastic modulus 62 given by…”
Section: Validation Using a Piezoelectric Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting equivalent elastic modulus b$$ {\mathcal{E}}_b $$ is 60.39 GPa. For this choice of material and geometric properties, the analytical solution 61 of the displacements for a simply supported beam with uniform load in the absence of a piezoelectric effect, the displacement at mid‐span is 2.156prefix×10prefix−4$$ 2.156\times 1{0}^{-4} $$ m. The elastic stiffness of the beam will be increased by the piezoelectric effect with the effective elastic modulus 62 given by true^b=b+false[eb311false]2κb33.$$ {\hat{\mathcal{E}}}_b={\mathcal{E}}_b+\frac{{\left[{e}_b^{311}\right]}^2}{\kappa_b^{33}}. $$ The equivalent piezoelectric coefficient can also be computed using stress relaxations, as eb311=prefix−16.53$$ {e}_b^{311}=-16.53 $$ C/m2$$ \mathrm{C}/{\mathrm{m}}^2 $$.…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%