2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06464.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the formation and evolution of black hole binaries

Abstract: We present the results of a systematic study of the formation and evolution of binaries containing black holes and normal-star companions with a wide range of masses. We first reexamine the standard formation scenario for close black hole binaries, where the progenitor system, a binary with at least one massive component, experienced a common-envelope phase and where the spiral-in of the companion in the envelope of the massive star caused the ejection of the envelope. We estimate the formation rates for diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

24
379
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
24
379
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for stars less massive than 30 M ⊙ , λs increase again when they have ascended the asymptotic giant branch and developed a deep envelope (see also Podsiadlowski et al 2003). As an illustration, Fig.…”
Section: The Binding Energy Parametermentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for stars less massive than 30 M ⊙ , λs increase again when they have ascended the asymptotic giant branch and developed a deep envelope (see also Podsiadlowski et al 2003). As an illustration, Fig.…”
Section: The Binding Energy Parametermentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this case the progenitor stars are usually more massive than 28 M ⊙ in binaries. For such massive stars the binding energy of the envelope is so large that with λ = λg a low-mass secondary inevitably merges with the He core of the primary, and no successful BH LMXBs can form (see also Podsiadlowski et al 2003). So in models A1 and A2 we set αCE = 1 with λ = λ b and λ h , respectively.…”
Section: The Donor Mass Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…or the entire donor mass is used in the initial orbital equation (Webbink 1984;de Kool 1990;Podsiadlowski et al 2003;Belczynski et al 2008),…”
Section: Population Synthesis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the value is known to vary with stellar type and age, many previous models have assumed a constant value, typically λ = 0.5 (Portegies Zwart & Yungelson 1998;Hurley, Tout & Pols 2002;Belczynski et al 2002;Podsiadlowski, Rappaport & Han 2003). The variation with stellar age has also been examined in detailed stellar evolution codes (Dewi & Tauris 2001;Ivanova & Taam 2003;Podsiadlowski et al 2003), where λ is shown to vary between 0.02 − 0.7. Population synthesis calculations that use a non constant value of λ are Voss & Tauris 2003;Podsiadlowski et al 2003;Kiel & Hurley 2006;Kiel et al 2008Kiel et al , 2010Hurley et al 2010).…”
Section: Population Synthesis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation