1993
DOI: 10.1109/52.199735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-the-fly program modification: systems for dynamic updating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Updates also typically degrade the system's performance, thus potentially causing deadlines to be missed [Segal and Frieder 1993]. Our system copes with these two issues explicitly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Updates also typically degrade the system's performance, thus potentially causing deadlines to be missed [Segal and Frieder 1993]. Our system copes with these two issues explicitly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is abundant work in the area of dynamic software updating systems [16]. These projects support executable code replacement at runtime.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their seminal paper, Segal and Frieder [10] identify a set of general requirements for any dynamic updating system: preserving program correctness (during and after the update), minimizing human intervention, supporting program restructuring and low-level program changes (e.g., both implementations and interfaces), supporting distributed programs (communicating across mutually distrustful administrative domains), not requiring special-purpose hardware and not constraining the language and environment. Their survey illustrates that in general, research has focused on mechanisms for implementing change at different levels of granularity (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%