2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the flame stabilization of turbulent lifted hydrogen jet flames in heated coflows near the autoignition limit: A comparative DNS study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the ignition front, as shown in Figure 6(b), ϕ s < ϕ ω is seen in the throughout pre-ignition zone, which is consistent with previous research. 30,58 The lower limit of the crossover progress variable for all equivalence ratios, namely C = 0.48, can therefore be used to safely distinguished the deflagration regime at different equivalence ratios, as demonstrated in Figure 7. In the following sections, the conditional value α at C 0 = 0 . 48 will serve as the local flame propagation mode indicator.…”
Section: Identification Of Local Combustion Modes and Flame Propagati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the ignition front, as shown in Figure 6(b), ϕ s < ϕ ω is seen in the throughout pre-ignition zone, which is consistent with previous research. 30,58 The lower limit of the crossover progress variable for all equivalence ratios, namely C = 0.48, can therefore be used to safely distinguished the deflagration regime at different equivalence ratios, as demonstrated in Figure 7. In the following sections, the conditional value α at C 0 = 0 . 48 will serve as the local flame propagation mode indicator.…”
Section: Identification Of Local Combustion Modes and Flame Propagati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Dirichlet boundary conditions, which impose conservative variables directly at boundaries, make the problem ill-posed leading to unwanted behaviors or even instabilities. This is avoided by characteristic boundary conditions, widely employed in the context of FD [227] and FV [228], and also with more recent numerical methods such as DG [229], SD [117] and LBM [110]. Originally introduced by Thompson for hyperbolic systems of equations [230], they were extended to the non-reacting Navier-Stokes equations by Poinsot and Lele [231] who named them as Navier-Stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions (NSCBC).…”
Section: Navier-stokes Characteristic Boundary Conditions For a Multi...mentioning
confidence: 99%