1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6378(199912)24:6<439::aid-col6>3.0.co;2-b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the field trials of CIECAM97s and its model structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CMCCAT2000 formula removes this problem by simplifying its structure. Sobagaki et al (1999) showed that the CMCCAT97 gives large errors for predicting corresponding colours under the very dim saturated yellow illumination used in one of the McCann experimental phases. Later, a new model, the CAT02 model (Fairchild, 2001), was developed by fi tting all available datasets except the McCann data with the same structure as CMCCAT2000.…”
Section: Colour Inconstancy Index Cmccon02supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The CMCCAT2000 formula removes this problem by simplifying its structure. Sobagaki et al (1999) showed that the CMCCAT97 gives large errors for predicting corresponding colours under the very dim saturated yellow illumination used in one of the McCann experimental phases. Later, a new model, the CAT02 model (Fairchild, 2001), was developed by fi tting all available datasets except the McCann data with the same structure as CMCCAT2000.…”
Section: Colour Inconstancy Index Cmccon02supporting
confidence: 72%
“…They believed that this set of conditions can provide a particularly severe test of chromatic adaptation transforms. As shown by Sobagaki et al [8], the CMCCAT97 gives large errors for predicting corresponding colours under the very dim saturated yellow illumination used in one of the McCann experimental phases. Later, a new model, the CAT02 model [9], was developed by fitting all available data sets except the McCann data with the same structure as CMCCAT2000.…”
Section: Why Replace Cmccon97 By Cmccon02?mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…14 Similar comparisons have been reported for the combined CIECAT94 and CIELAB model 14 and for CIECAM97s. 15 A comparison of the three results (Kuo et al, CIECAT94ϩCELAB, 14 and CIECAM97s 15 ) on ͗D N ͘ and ͗RMS N ͘ suggests that the predictions using the F*G* operation based on Kuo et al had larger deviations from the CSAJ observations than did the other two models. However, we are not able to discuss these points further in this article.…”
Section: Predictions With Kuo Et Al F*g* Functionsmentioning
confidence: 93%