1997
DOI: 10.2307/2691175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Fermat-Torricelli Points of Tetrahedra and of Higher Dimensional Simplexes

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Mathematical Association of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Mathematics Magazine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This intersection is the desired point P, which minimizes the sum kPAk kPBk kPCk (sufficiencies ensuring certain types of solution are explored by Shen and Tolosa [34]). An analogous result can also be observed by constructing the corresponding circumscribed circles of each of these three new equilateral triangles, creating a concurrency at the same optimal point P. Mathematical proofs for Fermat point problems of this type (both planar and spherical) are fairly abundant: For a deeper understanding of these available methods, the authors invite you to read [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: B Fermat Point Problemmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This intersection is the desired point P, which minimizes the sum kPAk kPBk kPCk (sufficiencies ensuring certain types of solution are explored by Shen and Tolosa [34]). An analogous result can also be observed by constructing the corresponding circumscribed circles of each of these three new equilateral triangles, creating a concurrency at the same optimal point P. Mathematical proofs for Fermat point problems of this type (both planar and spherical) are fairly abundant: For a deeper understanding of these available methods, the authors invite you to read [35][36][37][38][39].…”
Section: B Fermat Point Problemmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The properties of a curved surface mean it is impossible to find a two-dimensional (2-D) Earth projection system that is isometric [46] (i.e., preserves both angles and distances). The weighted Fermat point problem has been extended to surfaces [35][36][37]39] and to even higher dimensions [38]. Most notably Zachos and Cotsiolis [35] prove Eq.…”
Section: G Extension Onto the Spherementioning
confidence: 99%
“…But it is not the congruence, it is the equiangularity that justifies the name isogonic point. Moreover, if is an isogonic point inside the tetrahedron Σ, then this point is the Fermat-Torricelli point of Σ, see [1]. Let us call the Fermat-Torricelli point .…”
Section: Let Us Definementioning
confidence: 99%