The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2006
DOI: 10.1007/11617983_29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Feng-Rao Bound for Generalized Hamming Weights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even, it is seen to be of no significance that B should be a basis of F n q merely as just being some subset of F n q . For an outline of these observations we invite the reader to consult [12]. In the case of dual codes C ⊥ (B, G) the idea of using two bases B and B has proven fruitful in the study of cyclic codes.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even, it is seen to be of no significance that B should be a basis of F n q merely as just being some subset of F n q . For an outline of these observations we invite the reader to consult [12]. In the case of dual codes C ⊥ (B, G) the idea of using two bases B and B has proven fruitful in the study of cyclic codes.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of the above version of the Feng-Rao bound can be found in [12]. The proof there uses many of the same ideas as does the proof of Theorem 10. In the examples at the end of the paper we will see that the two bounds sometimes give similar results and sometimes they do not.…”
Section: Definition 15mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Building on [16,18,35] Andersen and Geil in [1] introduced a bound on the minimum distance of primary codes. This bound was later slightly generalized and enhanced in [23], but we shall refer also this version as Andersen and Geil's bound. The bound has the same flavor as the Feng-Rao bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%