2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2008.4543454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Feedback Linearization of Robots with Variable Joint Stiffness

Abstract: Physical human-robot interaction requires the development of safe and dependable robots. This involves the mechanical design of lightweight and compliant manipulators and the definition of motion control laws that allow to combine compliant behavior in reaction to possible collisions, while preserving accuracy and performance of rigid robots in free space. In this framework, great attention has been given to robots manipulators with relevant elasticity at the joints/transmissions. While the modeling and contro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
125
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Among these are the singular perturbation-based approaches [26], decoupling-based approaches [19], [27], backstepping-based schemes [28], and the passivity-based approaches [29], [30] to mention a few. In the same context, combined position and stiffness control of variable stiffness robots is more recently investigated using (a decoupling-based) feedback linearizion [31], [32]. These approaches generally combine closed-loop motor position and velocity control with link-side feedback on positions, torques, and their derivatives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these are the singular perturbation-based approaches [26], decoupling-based approaches [19], [27], backstepping-based schemes [28], and the passivity-based approaches [29], [30] to mention a few. In the same context, combined position and stiffness control of variable stiffness robots is more recently investigated using (a decoupling-based) feedback linearizion [31], [32]. These approaches generally combine closed-loop motor position and velocity control with link-side feedback on positions, torques, and their derivatives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we suggest an adaptive reference tension, which is low during regular motion and is increased during the periods of switching (see Figure 7a). To control the joint position as well as the antagonist tension force, we use input-output feedback linearization [42] through a two-step compensator. Satisfactory results in controlling a single joint were achieved.…”
Section: Puller-follower Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Palli et al [25], proposed a tracking control algorithm for such a flexible joint manipulator with variable stiffness actuation to achieve asymptotic tracking to the desired joint and stiffness trajectories based on inputoutput linearization, effectively an active cancellation of the intrinsic robot dynamics. Note that the main focus of [25] is the tracking control of the given joint and stiffness trajectories, and the problem of generating such desired trajectories for a given specific task is not addressed. On the other hand, if we rearrange the linearized dynamics of (1) (sin q ≈ q) as…”
Section: Passive Control Strategy In Swing Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%