Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOMW'06)
DOI: 10.1109/percomw.2006.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the feasibility of power control in current IEEE 802.11 devices

Abstract: Recent research in wireless communications has achieved important results by exploring more and more sophisticated solutions involving power control. Cross-layer design and topology control are the main examples. Although much has been done in the theoretical domain, there is still a large gap between theory and practice. In this paper, we investigate whether current IEEE 802.11 devices are able to comply with cross-layer and topology control requirements. Our study and associated measurement results reveal th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deploying the parameters stated in [17], we compare the energy consumption in Table 1. More explicitly, we assume that each message lasts for 1 ms and adopt the typical value of 32 mW (15 dBm) as transmit power of peer nodes and 63 mW (18 dBm) as transmit power of APs [17].…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Combination Of |N S | and |N A |mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Deploying the parameters stated in [17], we compare the energy consumption in Table 1. More explicitly, we assume that each message lasts for 1 ms and adopt the typical value of 32 mW (15 dBm) as transmit power of peer nodes and 63 mW (18 dBm) as transmit power of APs [17].…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Combination Of |N S | and |N A |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More explicitly, we assume that each message lasts for 1 ms and adopt the typical value of 32 mW (15 dBm) as transmit power of peer nodes and 63 mW (18 dBm) as transmit power of APs [17]. The total energy required for transmitting the averaged traffic shown in Figure 9 is calculated, assuming that each message lasts 1 ms. Again, it demonstrates that the (5,7) combination achieves the smallest energy consumption.…”
Section: Comparison Of Different Combination Of |N S | and |N A |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have analyzed the fidelity of transmit power control in commodity wireless network interface cards (NICs) [9,10]. Neither provides an exact calibration for our specific hardware, but they provide sufficient guidance for the type of experiments we have been performing.…”
Section: Transmit Power Precisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, all IEEE 802.11 radios are able to adjust their transmission rate on a per packet basis. In contrast, transmission power on a per packet basis is not customary and only several chipset vendors, in particular Atheros, have implementations that permit adjustment per packet [17]. Using packet injection along with the Click modular router, we observed with the chipsets used by our hardware (Section III-A) a granularity of 1 dBm.…”
Section: System Description: Carrier Sensing and Signal Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%